What does 2 Corinthians 6:8 mean?

5 3 minutes read

By honour and dishonour, by evil report and good report: as deceivers, and yet true; 2 Corinthians 6:8

Explanation

2 Corinthians 6:8 contains a juxtaposition that reflects the complex realities of the Christian experience as described by the Apostle Paul. In this verse, Paul acknowledges that as servants of God, Christians may be perceived in numerous, often contradictory ways. “By honour and dishonour, by evil report and good report” implies that they can be both respected and disrespected, and they might have a good reputation among some, but a bad one among others.

The phrase “as deceivers, and yet true” highlights the paradox that even though they may be accused of being false teachers or deceivers, they remain truthful in their message and faithful in their mission. This verse conveys that despite external perceptions and accusations, the integrity of the Christian message and the sincerity of the Christian witness endure.

Historical Context

The second epistle to the Corinthians is attributed to Paul and was written to address issues in the early Christian church in Corinth. During the time of writing, which is estimated to be around AD 55-57, Christianity was still a nascent religion often misunderstood and met with suspicion by both Jewish and pagan communities.

Paul was defending his apostleship against accusations from false apostles who had infiltrated the church in Corinth, casting doubt on Paul’s authority and message. This verse is part of a larger section where Paul is affirming his credentials as a minister of God, often through hardship and under severe scrutiny.

Theological Insights

From a theological standpoint, this verse speaks to the inherent tensions Christians might face in their walk of faith. It underscores the fact that being a proponent of the Gospel does not necessarily lead to worldly acclaim; rather, it may involve a complex reception including both praise and disdain.

Different theological traditions can draw various insights: for example, Protestant teachings may emphasize the importance of staying true to God’s word despite societal rejection, while Catholic interpretations might focus on the value of suffering and humility in the imitation of Christ.

Practical Applications

The verse can inspire believers to stand firm in their faith regardless of how they are perceived by others. It encourages Christians to remain committed to the truth of the Gospel even when faced with slander or false accusations. The message is that integrity and authenticity should not be compromised by the desire for human approval.

Practically, this might mean engaging in honest conversations, staying true to one’s values even under pressure, or simply continuing to do good work without seeking recognition. It is also a reminder to be discerning and compassionate towards others who may be misunderstood or unfairly judged.

Cross-References

Romans 14:16 – “Let not then your good be evil spoken of:”
1 Peter 2:12 – “Having your conversation honest among the Gentiles: that, whereas they speak against you as evildoers, they may by your good works, which they shall behold, glorify God in the day of visitation.”
Matthew 5:11 – “Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.”

Language Study

The original Greek language used in this verse provides greater nuance to the terms “honour” (δόξα, doxa) and “dishonour” (ἀτιμία, atimia). Doxa can mean opinion, judgment, or glory, while atimia can refer to disgrace or infamy. The phrase “as deceivers” (ὡς πλάνοι, hōs planoi) with “planos” meaning a wanderer or deceiver, and “yet true” (καὶ ἀληθεῖς, kai alētheis), where “aletheis” means truthful or genuine. This linguistic analysis reveals the contrast between the external perception and internal reality.

Cultural and Religious Comparisons

This verse, reflecting on the theme of duality and misunderstanding, has parallels in other religious traditions. For example, in Buddhism, the concept of “two truths” distinguishes between conventional and ultimate truths, encouraging a recognition of different levels of understanding. In Hinduism, Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita advises to perform one’s duty without concern for the fruits of action, which aligns with the message that one’s worth is not based on societal judgment.

Scientific Perspectives

From a scientific standpoint, psychological theories regarding the human need for social acceptance versus the pursuit of authenticity resonate with this verse. Research in social psychology might explore the cognitive dissonance that arises from holding true to one’s beliefs amidst external pressure or opposition. This tension between external perceptions and internal reality is a topic of great interest in the study of human behavior and self-concept.

Commentaries

Biblical scholars and commentators offer various perspectives on this verse. According to the Pulpit Commentary, Paul is setting forth the paradoxes of the Christian life, where the outer experience often contradicts the inner reality. John Gill’s Exposition of the Bible suggests that Paul is illustrating the varying judgments passed upon ministers of the Gospel, some seeing them as deceivers while others recognize the truth of their mission. The Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary implies that the trials are overcome by paradoxical combinations of experiences in the Christian’s life, balancing out worldly contempt and godly dignity.