What does Numbers 32:15 mean?

For if ye turn away from after him, he will yet again leave them in the wilderness; and ye shall destroy all this people. Numbers 32:15

Explanation

Numbers 32:15, within its biblical context, is a part of a conversation between Moses and the tribes of Reuben and Gad. The verse conveys a warning from Moses that if these tribes choose not to follow God and assist the other Israelites in conquering the land of Canaan, then God will abandon the entire Israelite community in the wilderness, resulting in their destruction. The verse emphasizes the importance of unity and obedience to God’s commands as central to the Israelites’ corporate identity and survival. It can be interpreted literally as a historical warning and also symbolically, representing the consequences of turning away from community responsibilities and divine direction.

Historical Context

The historical context of Numbers 32:15 centers on the Israelites’ journey to the Promised Land. Moses led the Israelites out of Egyptian slavery, through the wilderness, toward Canaan. Before crossing the Jordan River to enter Canaan, the tribes of Reuben and Gad expressed their desire to settle in the land east of the Jordan because it was suitable for their livestock. Moses responded with the warning in this verse, concerned that if these tribes did not help the others, it would lead to a repetition of the failure of faith that resulted in the wandering in the wilderness for 40 years.

Theological Insights

Theologically, this verse can be interpreted from different angles:

• From a covenantal perspective, the obedience and faithfulness of God’s people are directly linked to their enjoyment of God’s promises, as exemplified by the Israelites’ journey to the Promised Land.
• In the context of community, this passage emphasizes the shared responsibility and the collective consequences of the actions of its members.
• It also reflects the concept of divine retribution, where turning away from God results in negative consequences, underscoring the idea of God as just and righteous.

Practical Applications

Practically, this verse can inspire individuals to consider their role in a community and the impact of their actions on the collective well-being. It encourages participation in communal efforts and supports the idea that neglecting communal responsibilities can lead to harmful consequences for the whole group. It is a reminder to honor commitments and consider the broader impacts of personal decisions on a community or society.

Cross-References

• Deuteronomy 30:17-18: “But if thine heart turn away, so that thou wilt not hear, but shalt be drawn away, and worship other gods, and serve them; I denounce unto you this day, that ye shall surely perish…”
• Joshua 22:16: “Thus saith the whole congregation of the Lord, What trespass is this that ye have committed against the God of Israel, to turn away this day from following the Lord…”

Language Study

In the original Hebrew text, the verb “turn away” (תָּסֻ֜רוּ) implies a deliberate departure or rebellion against a path or directive. The word “leave” (יוֹסִ֣ף) suggests to add, increase, or do again, indicating a repeated action by God to leave the people, as He had done in the past. The original language thus emphasizes a willful choice to abandon God’s command and the consequential repetition of past failures.

Cultural and Religious Comparisons

Comparisons can be drawn with other ancient cultures that also espoused the belief in divine retribution. For instance, in ancient Mesopotamian religions, the concept of divine punishment for disobedience to the gods was prevalent. Additionally, this idea resonates with karma in Hinduism and Buddhism, where the actions of individuals influence their future circumstances.

Scientific Perspectives

From a scientific perspective, this verse does not directly intersect with modern scientific understandings, as it deals with matters of faith and obedience to divine authority. However, the collective behavior and its impacts on a community can be studied through the lenses of social sciences, such as psychology and sociology.

Commentaries

Biblical scholars and commentators have different interpretations of Numbers 32:15, focusing on its implications for the community of faith. Some see this as an example of the conditional nature of the Israelites’ relationship with God, while others highlight the interdependence of the tribes of Israel. Commentators like Matthew Henry emphasize the seriousness of the commitment to God and to the community, whereas others might delve into the typology of land as a symbol of rest and fulfillment of God’s promises.