What does Exodus 1:18 mean?
Exodus 1:18
"And the king of Egypt called for the midwives, and said unto them, Why have ye done this thing, and have saved the men children alive?"
Meaning and Explanation
In Exodus 1:18, the Pharaoh of Egypt angrily summons the Hebrew midwives and demands an explanation for why they have disobeyed his command to kill all newborn Hebrew boys.
This verse represents the moment of confrontation, revealing the midwives' courageous act of civil disobedience and Pharaoh's frustration as his genocidal plan begins to unravel.
It highlights a critical, early clash between the oppressive power of the state and the life-preserving faithfulness of individuals who fear God more than the king.
This pivotal verse captures the king's discovery that his secret, systematic decree (Exodus 1:16) is being subverted.
His question, "Why have ye done this thing, and have saved the men children alive?" is not a genuine inquiry but an accusation.
Top Rated Exodus Books
It marks the failure of his first, indirect attempt to control the Hebrew population through trusted professionals, forcing him to resort to a more public and brutal command for all Egyptians to participate in the murder (Exodus 1:22).
The midwives' quiet defiance becomes the first crack in Pharaoh's authority, demonstrating that even under totalitarian rule, faithful action can thwart evil schemes.
This moment sets the stage for God's direct intervention, showing that His plans for His people cannot be extinguished by human edicts.
Quick Reference
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| Book | Exodus |
| Testament | Old Testament |
| Genre | Historical Narrative |
| Author | Traditionally Moses |
| Audience | The Israelites, future generations |
| Key Theme | Divine preservation & civil disobedience |
Context
Immediate Context
Exodus 1:18 sits at the heart of a short narrative (Exodus 1:15-21) about two Hebrew midwives, Shiphrah and Puah.
Immediately before this verse, Pharaoh had commanded them to kill all male Hebrew babies at birth (v. 16).
The midwives, however, "feared God" and let the boys live (v. 17).
Verse 18 is Pharaoh's reactive confrontation upon discovering their disobedience.
Immediately after, the midwives offer a clever excuse to Pharaoh (v. 19), and God blesses them for their actions (v. 20-21).
Book Context
This episode occurs early in the Book of Exodus, which details Israel's transition from a family clan to a nation under oppression and, ultimately, redemption.
Chapter 1 establishes the context of severe persecution, setting up the need for a deliverer.
The failure of Pharaoh's first plan (using the midwives) leads to his second, more public decree (v. 22), which directly results in the exposure of the infant Moses (chapter 2).
Thus, this small story of two courageous women is the first sign of resistance that begins the chain of events leading to the Exodus. It establishes a key theme: God works through seemingly insignificant, faithful people to preserve His covenant promises.
Historical Background
The historical setting is crucial for understanding Pharaoh's fear and actions.
The Israelites are living in Egypt, likely during the New Kingdom period (16th-11th centuries BC), a time when Egypt was a dominant world power.
The "new king... which knew not Joseph" (Exodus 1:8) suggests a dynastic change, possibly with the rise of the native Egyptian 18th or 19th Dynasty, which would have viewed the Semitic Hyksos rulers (whom Joseph may have served) as illegitimate.
The Israelites, having grown numerous, were perceived as an internal "fifth column", a potential ally to Egypt's enemies.
| Factor | Detail |
|---|---|
| Date of Events | Likely 15th or 13th century BC (scholars debate) |
| Location | Eastern Nile Delta (land of Goshen), Egypt |
| Political Context | Pharaoh as absolute monarch, considered a god-king. National security concerns over a large foreign population. |
| Religious Context | Egyptian pantheon vs. the unseen God of the Hebrews. Pharaoh's decree is an act of chaos (killing infants) against the order (life) the Hebrew God upholds. |
Pharaohโs strategy is a classic tactic of oppression: target the males to prevent military resistance and slow population growth, while keeping females for assimilation and servitude.
Cultural Background
The role of the midwife is central to this story.
In the ancient Near East, midwifery was a respected, professional vocation, typically held by older women with extensive experience.
They assisted not only in childbirth but also in the initial care of the newborn.
Their role granted them intimate access to families and placed them in a position of significant social and moral trust.
Pharaohโs choice to use the midwives for his murderous scheme was calculated:
- Efficiency & Secrecy: It placed the execution of the decree at the most private momentโthe point of deliveryโaway from public view.
- Plausible Deniability: Infant mortality was high in the ancient world. Deaths could be attributed to birth complications, masking state-sponsored murder.
- Social Pressure: By commanding the Hebrew midwives to kill their own people, Pharaoh sought to co-opt the Hebrew social structure and create internal betrayal.
The midwives' defiance, therefore, was not just an ethical choice but a radical act of social solidarity, choosing their covenantal identity and professional integrity over the command of the sovereign.
Literary Features
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Genre | Historical Narrative with strong thematic irony. |
| Irony | The most powerful man in Egypt is thwarted by two seemingly powerless women. The instruments of death (midwives) become instruments of life. Pharaoh's plan to diminish Israel leads to God increasing them (v. 20). |
| Characterization | Pharaoh speaks from a position of assumed power and rage ("called for... said unto them"). The midwives are portrayed through their actions ("feared God... did not as the king commanded"). |
| Narrative Function | This episode creates narrative tension. Pharaoh's first plan fails, escalating the conflict and his desperation, which drives the plot toward the basket in the Nile. |
Word Study
| Original Word | Transliteration | Meaning | Strong's | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ืึฐืึทืึผึฐืึนืช | meyalledot | midwives, childbirth helpers | H3205 | The term comes from the root yalad (to bear, beget). It emphasizes their life-giving function, which Pharaoh tries to pervert into a death-dealing one. |
| ืึธืึธื | chayah | to live, keep alive, preserve life | H2421 | This is the key verb: "saved... alive." It stands in direct opposition to Pharaoh's command to "kill" (v. 16). It denotes not just passive non-action but active preservation. |
The "Men Children"
The Hebrew phrase habbanim is simply "the sons" or "the boys." The KJV's "men children" emphasizes these are male infants, the specific target of Pharaoh's policy.
Their preservation is crucial because the covenant lineage and future deliverance (through Moses, and ultimately Christ) depend on the survival of a male child.
Theological Significance
This verse, within its narrative, contributes significantly to several theological themes:
| Doctrine | Contribution |
|---|---|
| God's Providence | God's sovereign protection of His covenant people often works through the faithful choices of individuals. He preserves the line of promise in the face of systematic evil. |
| Human Agency & Obedience | It presents a profound case of civil disobedience. The midwives' duty to God's moral law ("fear God") trumps their duty to the state's unjust law. |
| The Fear of God | "The fear of the Lord" is portrayed as the beginning of wisdom and courage (Proverbs 9:10). It is a reverent awe that leads to obedience to God above all other authorities. |
| Blessing for Faithfulness | The narrative shows God blessing those who risk their lives for righteousness (Exodus 1:20-21). Blessing is not always material; here, it is primarily the establishment of their own families ("made them houses"). |
The Nature of God: This story reveals a God who is present with His suffering people. He is not passive; He empowers and honors those who align themselves with His life-giving purposes against the forces of death.
It is an early demonstration of God's commitment to the Abrahamic Covenant (Genesis 12:2-3, 15:5), ensuring the people become a great nation despite existential threats.
Interpretive Perspectives
Jewish Interpretation
Rabbinic tradition (e.g., Sotah 11b) extensively discusses Shiphrah and Puah.
They are often identified as Hebrew women (as in the text), but some traditions suggest they might have been Egyptian women who served the Hebrews, or even that Shiphrah and Puah were other names for Jochebed and Miriam (Moses' mother and sister).
Their excuse to Pharaoh (v. 19) is seen as a model of pious cunning, where God approves of the deceit because it was for saving life (pikuach nefesh).
The "houses" God made for them (v. 21) are interpreted as dynasties of priests (from Puah) and Levites/kings (from Shiphrah).
Historical Christian Interpretation
| Era | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Early Church | Church Fathers like Augustine saw the midwives as symbolic of the Church's ministers, who should bring souls to spiritual life despite persecution. Their fear of God was a model for Christian courage. |
| Reformation | Reformers emphasized the doctrine of the lesser magistrate and the individual's duty to obey God over man. This story was used to justify resistance to tyrannical rulers. |
| Modern | Scholars focus on historical-critical analysis (e.g., the story's origin, its role in the overall Exodus narrative) and its ethical implications for issues of conscience, civil disobedience, and the sanctity of life. |
Difficulties and Questions
What Makes This Verse Difficult?
The primary difficulty arises in the verse immediately following (1:19), where the midwives appear to tell Pharaoh a lie ("the Hebrew women are lively, and are delivered ere the midwives come in unto them").
This seems to conflict with commands against lying (e.g., Leviticus 19:11).
Common Misunderstandings
- That God blessed the midwives for lying. The text does not say this. God blessed them because they feared God and saved the boys alive (v. 17, 20-21). The blessing is tied to their life-preserving action and their primary motive (fear of God), not necessarily to the content of their subsequent excuse.
- That this story is about the virtue of deception. It is primarily a story about the preservation of innocent life in the face of state-sponsored murder. The ethical dilemma is acute: tell the truth and condemn infants to death, or mislead the tyrant to save lives.
How This is Typically Addressed
- The Priority of Life: Many ethicists argue that when moral duties conflict (truth-telling vs. preserving innocent life), the higher duty (preserving life) takes precedence. This is the principle of pikuach nefesh in Jewish law.
- A Clever Truth?: Some suggest the midwives' statement could have been a clever evasion or a half-truth, pointing to the vigorous nature of Hebrew women without directly addressing their own disobedience.
- God Judges the Heart: The narrative focuses on God's response to their fear of Him and their actions to save life. The story is told to highlight God's approval of their core moral choice, leaving the complexities of their speech for readers to ponder.
Cross-References
| Reference | Connection |
|---|---|
| Acts 5:29 | Peter's declaration, "We ought to obey God rather than men," is the New Testament echo of the midwives' principle. |
| Proverbs 16:6 | "By the fear of the LORD men depart from evil." The midwives embody this proverb. |
| Daniel 3 & 6 | Shadrach, Meshach, Abednego, and Daniel follow the same pattern: civil disobedience rooted in the fear of God, facing a furious king. |
| Matthew 2:16-18 | Herod's massacre of the infants in Bethlehem parallels Pharaoh's decree, showing a repeated pattern of evil powers trying to destroy God's chosen deliverer. |
| Hebrews 11:23 | Moses' parents hid him "because they saw he was a proper child; and they were not afraid of the king's commandment." This is the same "fear of God" exhibited by the midwives. |
Application
While the story is historical, its principles speak powerfully to modern life.
| Life Area | Application |
|---|---|
| Conscience & Vocation | When professional duties or workplace policies conflict with God's moral law, believers are called to "fear God" first. This may involve difficult choices, whistleblowing, or refusing to participate in unethical practices. |
| Sanctity of Life | The story is a foundational text for the pro-life ethic. It champions the protection of the most vulnerable (unborn and newborn) against cultural or legal forces that would devalue their lives. |
| Courage in Opposition | Standing against popular opinion or powerful authorities for what is right often starts with small, quiet acts of faithfulness. The midwives didn't lead a revolt; they simply did their jobs with integrity. |
| Trusting God's Providence | When evil schemes seem overwhelming, this story reminds us that God is at work through faithful people. Our role is to obey in the moment, trusting God with the ultimate outcome and our protection. |
This narrative encourages believers to discern when obedience to human authority must yield to obedience to God.
It reassures us that God sees and honors such faithfulness, often using it as a means to accomplish His greater redemptive purposes.
The application is not a call to habitual deception, but a call to prioritize active love and justice for the vulnerable, even at significant personal cost.
Related Verses
- Exodus 1:15-21: The full story of the Hebrew midwives.
- Proverbs 8:13: "The fear of the LORD is to hate evil."
- Esther 4:14: Mordecai's challenge to Esther, suggesting she was placed in her position "for such a time as this"โsimilar to the midwives.
- Jeremiah 1:5: God's calling and protection of the prophet before birth, affirming the value of life in the womb.
- Matthew 10:28: "Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell."
- 1 Peter 2:13-17: Instructions to submit to human authority, yet with the implied understanding that our ultimate freedom is in serving God.