What does Acts 16:20 mean?
Explanation
This verse, Acts 16:20, is part of an account in which the apostles Paul and Silas are brought before Roman authorities in the city of Philippi. The complaint is lodged by local businessmen who are upset that Paul and Silas have been teaching customs that are contrary to Roman laws.
The phrase "These men, being Jews, do exceedingly trouble our city" indicates an accusation against Paul and Silas not only for spreading Christianity, which was seen as a Jewish sect at the time, but also a suggestion of ethnic prejudice.
The accusers likely wanted to stir up the magistrates' suspicion towards these 'foreign' customs and practices.
In the context of the verse, Paul and Silas were causing a 'trouble' in the eyes of these individuals because their teaching of Christianity led to a loss of profit for the local businessmen, whose livelihood depended on the pagan practice of fortune-telling.
The charge of ‘exceeding trouble’ is a strong one, implying significant social disruption, which they hoped would prompt the magistrates to act against Paul and Silas.
Top Rated Acts Books
Historical Context
Acts 16:20 is found within the narrative of the Acts of the Apostles, a New Testament book detailing the spread of Christianity during the first century after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
This particular episode occurs on Paul's second missionary journey, when he and Silas are in the Roman colony of Philippi around AD 49-51.
The decision to accuse them of 'troubling the city' reflects the tensions of that time between traditional Roman values and the new Christian teachings.
It underscores the challenges that early Christians faced in preaching their faith in an environment that was, at times, hostile to their message.
Theological Insights
From a theological perspective, Acts 16:20 illustrates the theme of conflict between the early Christian church and the surrounding culture. It demonstrates the hostility that the message of Christianity could provoke, particularly when it affected the social or economic status quo.
Theologically, this confrontation can be seen as a confrontation between the kingdom of God as preached by Paul and Silas, and the kingdom of man, represented by the economic interests of the city.
Practical Applications
The teachings in Acts 16:20 can serve as a reminder to modern believers about the potential cost of discipleship.
Christians today may face opposition when their faith and practice challenge the cultural or economic practices of their context. The passage encourages believers to stand firm in their faith, even when it leads to misunderstanding or persecution.
Cross-References
- Acts 17:6: "And when they found them not, they drew Jason and certain brethren unto the rulers of the city, crying, These that have turned the world upside down are come hither also;"
- Acts 19:25-27: "Whom he called together with the workmen of like occupation, and said, Sirs, ye know that by this craft we have our wealth.
Moreover ye see and hear, that not alone at Ephesus, but almost throughout all Asia, this Paul hath persuaded and turned away much people, saying that they be no gods, which are made with hands: So that not only this our craft is in danger to be set at nought; but also that the temple of the great goddess Diana should be despised, and her magnificence should be destroyed, whom all Asia and the world worshippeth."
- 1 Thessalonians 2:2: "But even after that we had suffered before, and were shamefully entreated, as ye know, at Philippi, we were bold in our God to speak unto you the gospel of God with much contention."
Language Study
The key terms in the original Greek text include:
- "exceedingly" (ἐκταράσσουσιν): From the root ἐκταράσσω, meaning to stir up, unsettle, or disturb greatly.
- "trouble" (ταράσσω): To stir or throw into confusion, disturb the peace, cause an uproar.
- "our city" (τὴν πόλιν ἡμῶν): The term πόλις refers to a city or town, emphasising possession and belonging, as in 'our city.'
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In comparing this event to other ancient myths and religious interpretations, it's evident that new religious movements often face resistance from established cultural and religious systems.
Similar stories can be found in various ancient cultures where new ideas or movements upset the status quo, leading to scapegoating or persecution of those who challenge traditional beliefs.
Scientific Perspectives
Scientific perspectives might not directly apply to the analysis of Acts 16:20.
However, social sciences such as sociology and anthropology might offer insights into the dynamics of group conflict when established social orders are challenged by new ideologies, which is reflected in this account.
Commentaries
Various Bible commentators have noted the following points about Acts 16:20:
- Matthew Henry's Commentary highlights the unjust nature of the accusation, as it wasn't the preaching of Paul and Silas that troubled the city, but rather the loss of income for the merchants.
- John Gill's Exposition of the Bible suggests that the accusers were being hypocritical, as they were less concerned about Roman customs and more about their own financial gain.
- The Pulpit Commentary reflects on the common practice of anti-Semitism in the ancient world, noting that the use of the term "Jews" by the accusers was likely intended to invoke prejudice among the Roman citizens and magistrates.
These commentaries underscore the complex interplay of economic, ethnic, and religious tensions evident in this passage from Acts.