What does Acts 18:20 mean?
Explanation
The verse Acts 18:20 from the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible reads: "When they desired him to tarry longer time with them, he consented not;" This verse occurs within a passage describing Paul the Apostle's missionary work.
The "they" in this verse refers to the people of Ephesus, who were the audience of Paul's preaching.
The verse shows that the Ephesians wanted Paul to stay with them for a longer period of time, indicating that they valued his teachings and company.
However, Paul "consented not," meaning he did not agree to stay longer.
This refusal suggests that, despite the Ephesians' desire for his extended presence, Paul had other commitments or a sense of urgency in continuing his missionary journey elsewhere.
The deeper meaning points to the commitment to the broader mission over local attachments and the transient nature of apostolic ministry.
Top Rated Acts Books
Historical Context
At the time Acts 18:20 was written, Paul was on his second missionary journey, a significant period in the spread of early Christianity. Ephesus was a major city in the Roman Empire, located in what is now modern-day Turkey.
It was a center of trade and had a mix of cultures, religions, and philosophies. Acts 18 depicts Paul engaging with the Jewish and God-fearing Gentile population there, which was common practice for him to preach in synagogues first.
Theological Insights
From a theological perspective, this verse reflects the idea of divine calling and obedience.
Paul's refusal to stay longer may indicate his commitment to following God's plan for him, even over the wishes of his followers.
It also demonstrates the transient nature of the apostles' ministry, as they were called to spread the word broadly rather than remain in one place.
Some theologians may see in Paul's response an example of discernment, recognizing and responding to God's direction over human desires. Others might discuss the importance of spreading the Gospel and not becoming too comfortable in one place when there is a larger mission field.
Practical Applications
This verse serves as a reminder of prioritizing one's life mission or calling over comfort and popular demand.
It can encourage individuals to follow their convictions even when others wish for them to do otherwise.
In daily life, this might relate to making decisions that align with personal or spiritual goals, rather than conforming to the expectations of others.
Cross-References
- Acts 20:24 - "But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God."
- Acts 16:6-7 - "Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not."
Language Study
The key phrase in Acts 18:20 is "he consented not," translated from the Greek word "ouk" (οὐκ), which is a strong negative meaning "not" or "no" and "suneudokēsen" (συνευδόκησεν), which is derived from "syneudokeo" meaning to agree with or consent.
This emphasizes Paul's firm decision against staying longer.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In the context of other ancient religions and myths, Paul's decision to leave might be compared to various figures who were on a quest or mission, such as Odysseus from Homer's Odyssey, whose journey was marked by many detours yet always had the goal of returning home.
Similarly, Paul had an end goal for his missionary journeys, which he pursued despite local attachments or diversions.
Scientific Perspectives
From a scientific or psychological perspective, one could analyze Paul's decision-making process and his resistance to social pressure, which can be studied in terms of cognitive biases, social conformity, and commitment to personal goals.
Modern studies explore how individuals balance community desires against their own aims, a topic relevant to Paul's context.
Commentaries
Various biblical commentaries interpret Acts 18:20 differently.
Some, like the Matthew Henry Commentary, focus on Paul's willingness to leave as evidence of his dedication to God's work.
The Pulpit Commentary notes that his decision demonstrates his sense of duty and the sacrifice required of him as an apostle.
John Gill's Exposition of the Bible points out that Paul's refusal was polite yet firm, made with a view to his apostolic mission to preach to all nations.
Each commentary underscores the theme of devotion to divine calling above all else.