Acts 25

Now when Festus was come into the province, after three days he ascended from Caesarea to Jerusalem.

Then the high priest and the chief of the Jews informed him against Paul, and besought him,

And desired favour against him, that he would send for him to Jerusalem, laying wait in the way to kill him.

But Festus answered, that Paul should be kept at Caesarea, and that he himself would depart shortly thither.

Let them therefore, said he, which among you are able, go down with me, and accuse this man, if there be any wickedness in him.

And when he had tarried among them more than ten days, he went down unto Caesarea; and the next day sitting on the judgment seat commanded Paul to be brought.

And when he was come, the Jews which came down from Jerusalem stood round about, and laid many and grievous complaints against Paul, which they could not prove.

While he answered for himself, Neither against the law of the Jews, neither against the temple, nor yet against Caesar, have I offended any thing at all.

But Festus, willing to do the Jews a pleasure, answered Paul, and said, Wilt thou go up to Jerusalem, and there be judged of these things before me?

Then said Paul, I stand at Caesar's judgment seat, where I ought to be judged: to the Jews have I done no wrong, as thou very well knowest.

For if I be an offender, or have committed any thing worthy of death, I refuse not to die: but if there be none of these things whereof these accuse me, no man may deliver me unto them. I appeal unto Caesar.

Then Festus, when he had conferred with the council, answered, Hast thou appealed unto Caesar? unto Caesar shalt thou go.

And after certain days king Agrippa and Bernice came unto Caesarea to salute Festus.

And when they had been there many days, Festus declared Paul's cause unto the king, saying, There is a certain man left in bonds by Felix:

About whom, when I was at Jerusalem, the chief priests and the elders of the Jews informed me, desiring to have judgment against him.

To whom I answered, It is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any man to die, before that he which is accused have the accusers face to face, and have licence to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him.

Therefore, when they were come hither, without any delay on the morrow I sat on the judgment seat, and commanded the man to be brought forth.

Against whom when the accusers stood up, they brought none accusation of such things as I supposed:

But had certain questions against him of their own superstition, and of one Jesus, which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

And because I doubted of such manner of questions, I asked him whether he would go to Jerusalem, and there be judged of these matters.

But when Paul had appealed to be reserved unto the hearing of Augustus, I commanded him to be kept till I might send him to Caesar.

Then Agrippa said unto Festus, I would also hear the man myself. To morrow, said he, thou shalt hear him.

And on the morrow, when Agrippa was come, and Bernice, with great pomp, and was entered into the place of hearing, with the chief captains, and principal men of the city, at Festus' commandment Paul was brought forth.

And Festus said, King Agrippa, and all men which are here present with us, ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews have dealt with me, both at Jerusalem, and also here, crying that he ought not to live any longer.

But when I found that he had committed nothing worthy of death, and that he himself hath appealed to Augustus, I have determined to send him.

Of whom I have no certain thing to write unto my lord. Wherefore I have brought him forth before you, and specially before thee, O king Agrippa, that, after examination had, I might have somewhat to write.

For it seemeth to me unreasonable to send a prisoner, and not withal to signify the crimes laid against him.

What does Acts 25:12 mean?

Explanation

Acts 25:12 depicts a pivotal moment in the legal proceedings against the apostle Paul.

Having been accused by Jewish leaders of various crimes, including desecration of the temple, Paul is presented before Festus, the Roman procurator of Judea.

Festus, unsure how to adjudicate the case due to its religious complexity, asks Paul whether he is willing to go to Jerusalem and stand trial there.

Aware that he would likely not receive a fair trial and might even be assassinated (as noted in Acts 25:3), Paul invokes his right as a Roman citizen to appeal directly to Caesar, the emperor of Rome, for judgment.

Festus convenes with his council for advice and determines that Paul's appeal is valid.

Therefore, Festus declares that since Paul has appealed to Caesar, it is to Caesar that he will be sent. This marks a significant turn in Paul's journey, taking him to Rome, which he had long desired to visit to preach the gospel.

Top Rated Acts Books

Historical Context

The historical context of this verse is in the province of Judea during the Roman Empire, under the rule of Nero.

The timeframe is likely between 58-60 AD.

Acts 25:12 falls under the period of rule of Porcius Festus as the procurator of Judea, who succeeded Antonius Felix around AD 59 or 60.

The Roman judicial system allowed for citizens to appeal to the emperor in capital offenses.

This privilege was an important aspect of Roman citizenship and legal process, safeguarding the rights of citizens and ensuring that local injustices could be overruled by imperial authority.

Theological Insights

The appeal of Paul to Caesar is a demonstration of Divine Providence and the sovereignty of God in spreading the Gospel.

Paul's eventual journey to Rome aligns with his mission and fulfills Jesus' prophecy that he would witness in Rome (Acts 23:11).

This event illustrates that God can use even secular and pagan systems for His purposes.

Theologically, this passage underlines the belief that God is in control of history and can utilize all circumstances to advance His plans.

Practical Applications

Acts 25:12 can teach individuals about the importance of wisely navigating systems of power and justice.

Paul utilized his rights as a citizen for his protection and to further his mission.

This can encourage believers to be informed of their legal rights and to use them appropriately.

It also suggests that God can work in every situation, no matter how dire, and that faith in God's sovereignty should be maintained even in the face of injustice or uncertainty.

Cross-References

Acts 23:11: "And the night following the Lord stood by him, and said, Be of good cheer, Paul: for as thou hast testified of me in Jerusalem, so must thou bear witness also at Rome.”
Acts 26:32: “Then said Agrippa unto Festus, This man might have been set at liberty, if he had not appealed unto Caesar.”
Acts 27:1: "And when it was determined that we should sail into Italy, they delivered Paul and certain other prisoners unto one named Julius, a centurion of Augustus' band."
Acts 28:16: “And when we came to Rome, the centurion delivered the prisoners to the captain of the guard: but Paul was suffered to dwell by himself with a soldier that kept him.”
Acts 22:25-29: A passage where Paul brings up his Roman citizenship to avoid being flogged without trial.

Language Study

Key words in the original Greek of this verse include:

"Φῆστος" (Festus): the name of the procurator.
"συλλαλήσας" (syllalēsas): having conferred or discussed.
"συμβουλίου" (symbouliou): the council or advisory group.
"ἐπὶ Καίσαρα" (epi Kaisara): appeal unto Caesar; referring to the emperor.
"ἐπικαλεῖσαι" (epikaleisai): you have appealed, from the verb ἐπικαλέω, which has a legal connotation of invoking or appealing to a higher authority.

Cultural and Religious Comparisons

In the context of other ancient cultures, an appeal to a higher authority, such as a king or emperor, wasn't uncommon. What sets the Roman system apart was its codification of such rights for citizens, a concept less prevalent in more autocratic or theocratic ancient societies.

In contrast, in some religious interpretations, like within Judaism of that era, the high court or Sanhedrin was the ultimate earthly authority, without an additional secular appeal process.

Scientific Perspectives

While Acts 25:12 doesn't directly intersect with modern scientific understanding, scientific principles do underline the importance of verifiable evidence and fair trial procedures, concepts consistent with Paul obtaining a fair hearing.

The appeal to Caesar can also be seen as a step towards ensuring a more impartial and empirically grounded process, a precursor to the evidence-based approaches valued in modern jurisprudence.

Commentaries

Commentaries on Acts 25:12 emphasize the legal acumen of Paul and his understanding of Roman law and citizenship rights.

They often reflect on how God orchestrated events, including the Roman legal system, to bring Paul to Rome, where he would have a significant impact.

There's also discussion among commentators about the potential miscarriage of justice Paul faced in Jerusalem and how his appeal to Caesar speaks to his strategic thinking and inspired actions in the face of opposition.

Acts 25

Acts 25

What does Acts 25:12 mean?

Explanation

Top Rated Acts Books

Historical Context

Theological Insights

Practical Applications

Cross-References

Language Study

Cultural and Religious Comparisons

Scientific Perspectives

Commentaries

Want more context?

What does Acts 25:12 mean?

Explanation

Top Rated Acts Books

Historical Context

Theological Insights

Practical Applications

Cross-References

Language Study

Cultural and Religious Comparisons

Scientific Perspectives

Commentaries

Want more context?