What does Acts 28:6 mean?
Explanation
Acts 28:6 recounts the reaction of the native people of Malta after the Apostle Paul survived a viper's bite without any apparent harm.
The verse captures the changing attitudes of the islanders who first expected Paul to die or become ill and later, upon observing no such consequence, concluded that he must be a divine being.
This shift from expecting Paul's demise to deifying him reflects a common ancient pattern of interpreting extraordinary events in a religious or superstitious context.
Top Rated Acts Books
Historical Context
The account in Acts 28:6 is part of a larger narrative describing Paul’s journey to Rome after his arrest in Jerusalem.
Shipwrecked on the island of Malta, Paul is involved in an incident where he is bitten by a snake, yet suffers no ill effects.
At the time, snakebites were commonly believed to be fatal or to cause serious injury.
Furthermore, there was a prevalent belief in the ancient world that divine justice would be meted out immediately, and sudden death or illness could be seen as punishment for wrongdoing.
The reaction of the Maltese reflects the understanding of such events through the lens of divine or supernatural intervention.
Theological Insights
From a Christian theological perspective, this event illustrates God's protection and the power associated with His apostles. The lack of harm coming to Paul is often seen as a miraculous sign confirming his divine mission.
Additionally, the event in Malta can be compared to the promises Jesus made to His disciples in Mark 16:17-18, which mentions that believers will "take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them."
Practical Applications
The episode of Paul on Malta encourages believers to trust in God's protection, especially when facing dangers while carrying out their mission. Paul's calmness throughout the event can serve as an example for dealing with adversity with faith rather than fear.
Furthermore, the episode demonstrates the importance of not jumping to conclusions based on limited understanding, cautioning against superstitious beliefs and the deification of humans.
Cross-References
- Mark 16:17-18: "And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover."
- Luke 10:19: "Behold, I give unto you power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy: and nothing shall by any means hurt you."
Language Study
In the original Greek text, the word translated as "swollen" is "πίμπρημι" (pimprēmi), meaning "to inflame" or "to swell," and reflects the expectation of a physical reaction to the venom.
"Fallen down dead suddenly" comes from the Greek "καταπίπτω" (katapiptō) and "ἀφνω" (aphnō), indicating an immediate collapse or demise.
"Changed their minds" is translated from "μεταβάλλω" (metaballō), which means "to change" or "to turn." The word "god" is translated from "θεός" (theos), alluding to the islander's new perception of Paul's identity as a divine being.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
The incident mirrors many ancient myths where mortals were sometimes mistaken for gods due to their extraordinary deeds or survival of deadly events.
Greek and Roman mythology are replete with stories of gods walking the earth in human form and being recognized by their supernatural powers.
The response of the Maltese also illustrates a broader human tendency to explain the unexplainable through divine or mystical narratives.
Scientific Perspectives
Modern scientific knowledge about snake venom would explain Paul's survival as a result of either the viper's bite not injecting a significant amount of venom or the snake being non-venomous.
It's also possible that Paul had an unusually strong reaction to the venom that led to a quick recovery.
The ancient interpretation of a miraculous survival would not have considered these possibilities.
Commentaries
Bible scholars and commentators have offered various insights into this verse.
Some like Matthew Henry interpret it as a testament to God's miraculous intervention on behalf of Paul.
Others suggest that it is a narrative device Luke uses to show the spread of the Gospel to the Gentiles, and how the apostle's work is met with diverse reactions.
Craig S.
Keener, in his commentary on Acts, discusses the cultural backgrounds that would contribute to the Maltese islanders' reaction, pointing out that such interpretations of unusual events were common in ancient times.