What does Luke 14:20 mean?
Explanation
Luke 14:20 relates a part of Jesus' parable of the Great Banquet.
In this verse, a person invited to the banquet justifies his inability to attend because he has married a wife.
The verse exposes a common human tendency to prioritize personal life events or relationships over spiritual or divine invitations. The literal meaning is straightforward: a man excuses himself from attending an important event due to his recent marriage.
However, the deeper meaning reveals the potential hindrances that personal attachments and obligations can pose on one's spiritual journey or response to God's calling.
Top Rated Luke Books
Historical Context
Luke 14:20 is part of the larger narrative of Luke's Gospel, written to a Greek-speaking audience between 80 and 110 AD.
This parable is told by Jesus in the setting of a meal at a Pharisee's house, where He teaches about humility and the importance of inviting the marginalized to banquets.
At the time, marriages had significant social importance, and the initial year of marriage had particular resonance, with some Jewish customs suggesting certain exemptions from public duties for those in their first year of matrimony.
Theological Insights
Different theological viewpoints offer insights into this verse:
- Traditional Christian Commentators often perceive this as an illustration of excuses that prevent people from accepting God's invitation to the Kingdom.
- Liberation Theology might see this as prioritizing a personal agenda over the justice and equality represented in God's feast.
- Covenant Theology sees the Great Banquet as symbolizing God's covenant with His people and any excuses as a rejection of that covenant relationship.
Practical Applications
This verse can prompt practical considerations such as:
- Evaluating personal priorities to ensure they align with one's spiritual values.
- Being mindful of the ease at which legitimate aspects of life, such as relationships, can become excuses for neglecting important spiritual practices or community responsibilities.
- Reflecting on one's own excuses that avoid deeper engagement with faith and community service.
Cross-References
- Matthew 22:1-14 - Another parable of a wedding feast where invitees make excuses.
- Revelation 19:7-9 - The imagery of marriage related to the celebration of God's kingdom, known as the "marriage supper of the Lamb."
- Deuteronomy 24:5 - Law concerning a newly married man not having to go to war or be charged with any business except being happy with his wife.
Language Study
The key phrase in the original Greek text is γυναῖκα ἔγημα (gunaika egēma), which means "I have married a wife." The verb ἔγημα (egēma) is the first person singular perfect active indicative of γαμέω (gameō), signifying a completed action with ongoing effects.
The emphasis is on the present state derived from a past action (the marriage), which the man uses to justify his absence from the banquet.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In comparing to other cultural and religious narratives:
- Ancient Roman and Greek festivities also held marriage and related celebrations in high regard.
- In Hinduism, the concept of 'Grihastha' or the householder stage, places emphasis on marriage as a sacred duty that includes religious obligations.
- Buddhism, on the other hand, might interpret this as attachment and desire causing one to miss out on spiritual opportunities.
Scientific Perspectives
From a scientific perspective, this verse might invoke consideration of the psychological aspects of attachment and commitment.
Behavioral science recognizes that personal relationships and social obligations have significant influence on decision-making processes and prioritizing of one's time and resources.
Commentaries
Various expert commentaries provide insight on this verse:
- John Calvin comments that Jesus uses everyday events to show how people prioritize temporal affairs over divine ones.
- William Barclay notes the validity of the man's excuse in worldly terms but emphasizes that nothing should be placed above the Kingdom of God.
- Matthew Henry interprets that the new relationship became idolized, and thus, a barrier to accepting the divine invitation.