What does Matthew 15:5 mean?
Explanation
Matthew 15:5 is a part of a larger dialogue in which Jesus criticizes the Pharisees and scribes for their hypocrisy and for placing human traditions above the commandments of God.
In this verse, Jesus quotes a common saying or practice of the time that allowed a person to dedicate something to God as a gift – referred to in Greek as "Corban" (Mark 7:11) – which would exempt them from using that same property or money to help their parents.
The literal meaning of this verse exposes a religious loophole that some people were using to avoid the responsibility of financially supporting their aging parents.
The deeper meaning addresses the issue of maintaining the integrity of God's commandments against man-made traditions that undermine them.
Top Rated Matthew Books
Historical Context
This verse must be understood within the context of first-century Jewish society, where honoring one's parents was a significant commandment derived from the Torah, specifically from Exodus 20:12 and Deuteronomy 5:16, which instruct to honor one's father and mother.
The Pharisees were the religious leaders of the time and were known for their strict adherence to the Torah as well as their oral traditions, which they held in high esteem.
Jesus was confronting the way in which these traditions, at times, invalidated the word of God, specifically in this instance, how it affected family obligations and the welfare of parents.
Theological Insights
From a theological perspective, Matthew 15:5 highlights the tension between the adherence to religious practices and the ethical treatment of others – a theme that is recurrent in Jesus' teaching.
It challenges the interpretation of religious laws in ways that may neglect love, mercy, and justice.
Various theological traditions interpret this verse with different emphases:
- Traditionalist views might focus on the importance of adhering to the letter of the Law of Moses.
- Reformist or Christian views emphasize the spirit of the Law, which Jesus advocated for, as reflected in his broader teachings.
- Liberation theology might interpret this practice as a way the powerful manipulate religion to forsake the needs of the vulnerable.
Practical Applications
The teaching of this verse can be applied in daily life by encouraging believers to examine their practices and traditions.
It calls for reflection on whether these practices have inadvertently become ways to avoid doing good or fulfilling important responsibilities.
People are urged to uphold the spirit of compassion and charity over legalistic interpretations or traditions that may contradict ethical and moral principles.
Cross-References
- Exodus 20:12: "Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee."
- Mark 7:11: "But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free."
- Isaiah 29:13: "Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men:"
- Ephesians 6:2: "Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise;"
Language Study
A key word in the original Greek text of this verse is "korban," which was a term used for a gift dedicated to God, making it no longer available for any secular or common use, including helping one’s parents.
The word for "honour" in Greek, "timao,” also used in this context, means to revere or value. It emphasizes the nature of the commandment to honor one's parents not only in word but in one's actions, extending to one's obligations to care for them.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
Within other ancient cultures, honoring one’s parents was also a common virtue; for example, in ancient Rome, the pietas (duty) included familial duty.
In Confucianism, filial piety (xiao) is a fundamental virtue that emphasizes respect and care for one’s parents.
This practice of "Corban" as critiqued by Jesus presents a counterpoint to these cultural virtues, highlighting a religious practice that could subvert familial obligations.
Scientific Perspectives
There isn't a direct scientific perspective on this verse; however, modern psychological and sociological studies often affirm the importance of caring for the welfare of elders in society.
The wellbeing of aging parents has been linked to the support received from their children, thus giving some modern context to the ancient commandment of honoring one's parents.
Commentaries
Commentators on this verse note that Jesus is challenging the religious authorities.
For instance, the Pulpit Commentary emphasizes that Jesus is showing the moral failure of the Pharisees’ interpretation of the Law.
Matthew Henry's Commentary suggests that Jesus explains the Law's requirement to provide for parents is not abolished by a vow to God, indicating the vow is void if it neglects fundamental moral duties.
John Calvin's Commentary might point out that human traditions should not overshadow God's commandments and that, in this case, love and charity as fundamental Christian values supersede ritual law.