What does 2 Corinthians 6:15 mean?

Explanation

2 Corinthians 6:15 confronts the issue of the compatibility, or lack thereof, between believers in Christ and unbelievers (the term "Belial" being a representation of evil or the devil).

This verse asks rhetorically whether there can be harmony between the personification of good (Christ) and the personification of evil (Belial).

Additionally, it questions the connection between "he that believeth," a Christian, and "an infidel," a nonbeliever.

At its core, the verse highlights the stark difference in values, beliefs, and behaviors between Christians and non-Christians, suggesting that they are fundamentally incompatible and should not be yoked together in close association or partnership.

Historical Context

This verse is part of a letter written by the Apostle Paul to the church in Corinth around A.D. 55-57.

The early Christian community in Corinth was a diverse group, and members were confronted with the challenge of living holy lives in a cosmopolitan and often morally lax city.

The text speaks to the need for separation from pagan practices and the influences of the surrounding culture, which were in conflict with the Christian faith.

Paul advocates for a clear distinction between the lives of Christians and those of non-Christians.

Theological Insights

From a theological standpoint, 2 Corinthians 6:15 can be interpreted through the lens of Christian exclusivism, which holds that a relationship with Christ is incompatible with adherence to other religious or non-religious beliefs.

The verse can also present a view of spiritual warfare, where good and evil are in constant conflict.

Furthermore, it addresses the idea of spiritual purity and the risks of being influenced or led astray by relationships with non-believers, which may compromise one's faith.

Practical Applications

The teachings of this verse can be applied in various aspects of daily life.

For Christians, it may guide decisions related to forming close relationships, business partnerships, or other alliances, suggesting a careful evaluation of the potential spiritual influence of those involved.

It may also influence community engagement, prompting believers to cultivate a supportive network within their faith while navigating their broader societal interactions with discernment and integrity.

Cross-References

• Ephesians 5:7: "Be not ye therefore partakers with them."
• 1 Corinthians 10:21: "Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils."
• 2 Corinthians 6:14: "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?"

Language Study

In the original Greek text, key words such as "concord" (συμφώνησις - symphonēsis) suggest an agreement or harmony, typically used to describe the concord of musical instruments.

"Belial" (Βελίαρ - Beliar) is a transliteration of a Hebrew name for Satan or the devil, implying worthlessness or lawlessness.

The word "part" (μερὶς - meris) refers to a portion or share, indicating participation or association.

The term "believeth" (πιστεύων - pisteuōn) denotes one who has faith, particularly in Jesus Christ, while "infidel" (ἄπιστος - apistos) translates to an unbeliever or one who lacks faith, not just in a religious sense but also in terms of trustworthiness.

Cultural and Religious Comparisons

The theme of avoiding alliances with those who hold different religious views is not unique to Christianity and can be found in various ancient cultures and religious traditions.

For example, in Judaism, there are prohibitions against intermarrying with nations that worship other gods to prevent the Israelites from adopting pagan practices.

In some ancient myths, the concept of opposing forces similar to Christ and Belial is often depicted through battles between gods representing good and chaos or order and disorder.

Scientific Perspectives

The concepts presented in this verse are largely of a spiritual nature and do not directly intersect with empirical scientific understandings.

However, from a psychological or sociological perspective, the tendency of individuals to associate with like-minded people, known as homophily, supports the idea that deep bonds and partnerships are more frequently formed between those who share similar values and beliefs.

Commentaries

Biblical scholars and theologians offer various interpretations of this verse.

Many agree that it serves as a caution to Christians regarding their close associations with non-Christians, intending to preserve the purity of their faith and lifestyle.

Some commentaries focus on the aspect of evangelism, noting that while believers should retain their distinct identity, they also have a mission to engage with nonbelievers in a loving and redemptive manner.

Others point out the importance of understanding the context, Paul is not demanding complete separation from the world, but rather cautioning against binding partnerships that could lead believers away from their commitment to Christ.