What does Acts 13:21 mean?
Explanation
This verse recounts a significant decision in Israel's history, the shift from a theocratic system, where God directly governed the people, to a monarchy, with a human ruler.
After the time of the judges, where various leaders (judges) were raised up by God to deliver Israel from oppression, the people of Israel asked for a king to lead them, like the other nations around them.
In acquiescing to their request, God appointed Saul, son of Kish, from the tribe of Benjamin. Saul ruled for around 40 years, according to this passage in Acts, which is an address by the apostle Paul recounting Israel's history to the synagogue in Antioch Pisidia.
Top Rated Acts Books
Historical Context
At the time this verse was written in Acts, Paul was on his first missionary journey, and the account is part of his sermon to the Jews and God-fearing Gentiles.
The tribe of Benjamin, being one of the smaller tribes, was not regarded as likely to produce a king, which emphasizes God's sovereign choice.
The 40-year reign mentioned corresponds to a common biblical period of significance, often associated with testing or probation.
Theological Insights
The choice of Saul as king followed a period where Israel was led by judges, reflecting a theological shift from divine leadership to human kingship.
Some theologians might emphasize that Israel's desire for a king indicated a rejection of God's direct rulership.
Others might discuss God's permissive will, how He allowed the people to make this decision whilst still working out His purposes through it.
The mention of the tribe of Benjamin can have theological implications, as it shows God's ability to use the small and seemingly insignificant to fulfill His purposes.
Practical Applications
This verse speaks to the desire for human leadership and rejection of divine guidance, themes that resonate with human nature's tendency to prefer what is seen over what is unseen.
It challenges believers to consider where they might be rejecting God's authority in their lives.
Additionally, the example of Saul, an unlikely candidate for king, suggests that leadership can come from unexpected places and that people should be open to God's surprises.
Cross-References
- 1 Samuel 8:5 - And said unto him, Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: now make us a king to judge us like all the nations.
- 1 Samuel 9:15-17 - The Lord had told Samuel in his ear a day before Saul came, saying, tomorrow about this time I will send thee a man out of the land of Benjamin, and thou shalt anoint him to be captain over my people Israel.
- 1 Samuel 10:1 - Then Samuel took a vial of oil, and poured it upon his head, and kissed him, and said, Is it not because the Lord hath anointed thee to be captain over his inheritance?
- Hosea 13:11 - I gave thee a king in mine anger, and took him away in my wrath.
Language Study
The key words in this verse include "desired" (ēitēsanto in Greek), which suggests a strong yearning or demand, and "gave" (edōken in Greek), indicating an action taken by God to grant a request.
"Saul" (Σαούλ in Greek, Sha'ul in Hebrew) means "asked for" or "borrowed," reflecting the people's demand for a king. Understanding the original language nuances adds depth to the text, highlighting the relational dynamics between God and the Israelites.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
At the time of Saul's appointment, neighboring nations often had monarchies, making the Israelites' request culturally understandable.
Compared to ancient myths, where gods appoint kings as a sign of favor, the biblical narrative is unique in portraying the appointment as a concession to the people's demands rather than a divine endorsement of monarchy.
This can contrast with divine-choice concepts often seen in other ancient cultures, like the Mandate of Heaven in Chinese tradition.
Scientific Perspectives
The historical length of Saul's reign is a factual claim that intersects with archaeology rather than theoretical science.
While archaeological and historical studies can endeavor to verify biblical chronologies and reign lengths, the "forty years" should sometimes be taken not strictly but as a symbolic time frame representing a generation or a long period.
Commentaries
Various biblical scholars have commented on this verse.
John Gill remarks on the unusualness of the small tribe of Benjamin providing the first king of Israel and interprets the forty years as a literal period of Saul's reign.
Matthew Henry highlights the Israelites' failure to recognize God as their king.
He also notes that their insistence on a king reflected a lack of faith and ungratefulness.
Adam Clarke discusses the tribe of Benjamin's previous reduction in numbers and its subsequent honor in providing the first king.
These different commentaries open up a spectrum of understanding regarding the social and spiritual implications of Israel's transition to monarchy.