What does Acts 13:28 mean?
Explanation
The verse Acts 13:28 from the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible forms part of the speech that the Apostle Paul delivered in the synagogue at Pisidian Antioch.
In this speech, Paul is recounting the story of Jesus' crucifixion and the events leading up to it.
The "they" in this verse refers to the Jewish leaders of the time, who, according to the account, were determined to have Jesus put to death despite not finding any legitimate reason or crime deserving of death under the law.
Essentially, this highlights the perceived injustice that was carried out against Jesus, indicating that, although there was no legal basis for his death, the leaders insisted to the Roman Governor Pontius Pilate that Jesus should be executed.
Top Rated Acts Books
Historical Context
Acts 13:28 appears in the context of the early Christian church’s efforts to evangelize Gentiles and Jews alike.
The book of Acts was authored by Luke, who also wrote the Gospel of Luke.
The speech where this verse is located was given by the Apostle Paul approximately in 46-48 AD.
The historical setting of Jesus' trial was Roman-occupied Judea, where political tensions were high, and Jewish religious authorities held significant sway over the local populace while trying to navigate a relationship with the Roman government, which had ultimate authority.
Theological Insights
From a theological standpoint, this verse underscores themes such as the innocence of Christ, the willful blindness and culpability of the religious leaders, and the fulfillment of prophecy, Jesus' death was seen as part of God's redemptive plan despite human injustice.
Various theological traditions interpret these events differently.
For instance, some emphasize the predestination aspect, while others focus on the human agency and responsibility reflected in the Jewish leaders' adamant demand for Jesus' execution.
Practical Applications
In applying this verse to daily life, one could reflect on the principles of justice and fairness, recognizing the importance of not allowing personal bias or societal pressure to override the pursuit of truth and justice.
It also may serve as a contemplation on forgiveness, considering how Jesus responded to his accusers and executioners.
Furthermore, individuals might consider the cost of standing for truth in the face of opposition.
Cross-References
- Luke 23:4 "Then said Pilate to the chief priests and to the people, I find no fault in this man."
- John 19:4,6 "Pilate therefore went forth again, and saith unto them, Behold, I bring him forth to you, that ye may know that I find no fault in him...
When the chief priests therefore and officers saw him, they cried out, saying, Crucify him, crucify him.
Pilate saith unto them, Take ye him, and crucify him: for I find no fault in him."
- Isaiah 53:7 "He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth."
Language Study
The key words in the original Greek language of this text include:
- "Cause of death" (αἰτίαν θανάτου): which implies a justified reason or charge that would warrant a death penalty.
- "Desired" (ᾐτοῦντο): This term translates to "they asked for" or "pleaded," indicating an insistence or pleading.
- "Slain" (ἀναιρεθῆναι): This translates to "be put to death" or "be taken away," commonly used for executions.
These specific terms emphasize the lack of a lawful basis for the execution and highlight the intensity of the demand from the Jewish leaders.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
Comparing this narrative with other ancient myths and religious interpretations, one might explore the theme of a sacrificial figure whose death is unjust.
Many cultures have stories of innocent or divine beings who suffer or are killed unjustly.
However, in the case of the Christian narrative, Jesus' death is unique as it is seen both as unjust from a human perspective and as divinely ordained for the purpose of salvation.
Scientific Perspectives
Scientific perspectives may not directly apply to this verse, as it deals with historical events and theological concepts beyond the scope of empirical science.
However, forensic analysis could be considered when discussing the historical crucifixion practices in the Roman world and what constituted the causes of death legally acceptable for crucifixion at the time.
Commentaries
Commentators offer varied interpretations and applications regarding Acts 13:28.
Many affirm the historical reliability and theological significance of the trial and execution of Jesus.
Matthew Henry's Commentary, for instance, reflects on the perverse determination of the Jewish leaders to have Jesus killed, despite Pilate's acknowledgment of his innocence.
Other commentators, like John Gill, discuss the judicial process in Roman law and draw attention to the remarkable fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies regarding the Messiah's suffering and death.