What does John 19:32 mean?
Explanation
John 19:32 speaks of the moment in the crucifixion narrative when the soldiers, who were tasked with carrying out executions, came to Jesus and the two others who were crucified alongside Him, to break their legs.
This act of breaking the legs of crucified individuals was a practice known as "crurifragium," which was done to hasten death, ensuring the crucifixion did not continue into the Jewish holy day.
Death by crucifixion typically came slowly through asphyxiation as the condemned could no longer support themselves to breathe; breaking the legs accelerated this process since the condemned could no longer push themselves up to relieve the pressure on their chests.
Top Rated John Books
Historical Context
At the time of the crucifixion of Jesus, Judea was under Roman occupation. Roman crucifixion was a common form of execution for slaves, pirates, and enemies of the state.
It was designed to be a public spectacle, deterring others from committing similar crimes.
The time before the arrival of Sabbath (Jewish holy day) was significant because Jewish law prohibited leaving the body of the executed on the cross during the Sabbath, especially during Passover, which is when the crucifixion took place.
Theological Insights
From a theological perspective, the breaking of the legs of the two crucified with Jesus but not breaking Jesus' own (as seen in subsequent verses, John 19:33-36) is often highlighted as a fulfillment of prophecy and a sign of His divine mission.
For Christians, prophetic scriptures such as Psalm 34:20 ("He keepeth all his bones: not one of them is broken") are seen as prefiguring this event and signifying Jesus as the messianic Paschal Lamb whose bones would not be broken, unlike the Passover lambs sacrificed in the Old Testament.
Practical Applications
This verse can prompt believers to reflect on the fulfillment of prophecy and God's control over events, even in the midst of suffering.
It may also challenge individuals to consider the significance of respecting religious observances while grappling with the sometimes conflicting demands of civil authorities or societal norms.
Moreover, it can encourage examining how one applies laws and principles, balancing mercy, justice, and tradition.
Cross-References
- Exodus 12:46 "In one house shall it be eaten; thou shalt not carry forth ought of the flesh abroad out of the house; neither shall ye break a bone thereof."
- Psalm 34:20 "He keepeth all His bones: not one of them is broken."
- Numbers 9:12 "They shall leave none of it unto the morning, nor break any bone of it: according to all the ordinances of the passover they shall keep it."
- John 19:36 "For these things were done, that the scripture should be fulfilled, A bone of him shall not be broken."
Language Study
In the original Greek text, the word for "brake" is "συντρίβω" (syntribo), which means to break, break in pieces, or shatter.
The word carries the connotation of a violent, complete breaking. The severity of this action indicates the intention to bring about a swift end to the lives of those being crucified.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In comparing with other ancient customs, Roman execution methods such as crucifixion were not unique in their brutality.
Many ancient civilizations had methods of capital punishment that also served as a public deterrent.
However, the Jewish law of not allowing the body to remain on display during the holy day sets this narrative apart, highlighting the synaptic relationship between Roman execution practices and Jewish custom.
Scientific Perspectives
From a medical standpoint, the process of crurifragium would have caused rapid death through shock and asphyxiation.
Modern medical analysis of crucifixion shows that breaking the legs would lead to an inability to push up for breathing, causing the victim to suffocate more quickly.
Commentaries
Biblical commentaries often note the significance of the legs of the two criminals being broken but not Jesus'.
Matthew Henry's Commentary, for example, points out that this detail illustrates the divine plan underlying the events of the crucifixion.
This viewpoint is echoed in the Pulpit Commentary and others, which often focus on the fulfillment of prophecy and the way Jesus' death diverged from typical crucifixion outcomes.
They also commonly emphasize the way in which these events fit into the broader narrative of Jesus' sacrificial role and redemption.