What does John 9:29 mean?
Explanation
John 9:29 is a statement made by the Pharisees during an interrogation of a man born blind whom Jesus had healed (John 9:1-34).
The verse captures a moment of tension where the Pharisees express their disdain for Jesus by contrasting their certain knowledge of Moses as a prophet who spoke with God with their skepticism regarding Jesus' origins and authority.
They firmly assert their allegiance to Moses and indirectly question Jesus' legitimacy, suggesting that while Moses is a known figure of divine revelation, this "fellow" (referring to Jesus) is of unknown and perhaps dubious origin.
Top Rated John Books
Historical Context
This verse is part of the Gospel of John, which was composed probably between 90-110 A.D.
It reflects the conflict between the early Christian community and the Jewish religious establishment.
At the time of Jesus, Jews had a deep reverence for Moses, the lawgiver, and considered him the greatest of the prophets.
Acknowledging someone as a prophet meant accepting their divine authority and message.
The Pharisees, a predominant religious group of the time, viewed Jesus' teachings and actions with skepticism and oftentimes hostility, leading to confrontations like the one described in this chapter.
Theological Insights
From a theological perspective, this verse reflects the struggle between faith in Jesus and adherence to traditional Jewish beliefs.
While the Pharisees hold onto the authority of Moses, Jesus' miracles point to a new authority given by God.
This verse illustrates the broader Johannine theme of Jesus as the Light of the World that the Pharisees fail to recognize due to their spiritual blindness.
The tension between the known and the unknown also points to the challenge of recognizing divine activity that does not fit within established religious expectations.
Practical Applications
In contemporary terms, this verse may serve as a reminder of the caution needed when encountering new teachings or leaders claiming divine authority.
It calls for discernment when evaluating what is from God and what is not, just as the Pharisees tried to discern who Jesus was.
Practically, it can encourage believers to be grounded in their faith and scripture while remaining open to the move of God, which may come in unexpected ways.
Cross-References
- Acts 3:22 - "For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you."
- John 5:45-46 - "Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust.
For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me."
- John 10:25 - "Jesus answered them, I told you, and ye believed not: the works that I do in my Father's name, they bear witness of me."
Language Study
- "God" (Greek: Θεός, Theos): The divine being and ultimate authority, as commonly referred to in Christian scripture.
- "Spake" (Greek: λαλέω, laleo): Means to talk or say.
- "Moses": Refers to the prophet of the Hebrew Bible who led the Israelites out of Egypt and received the Law from God.
- "Fellow" (Greek: οὗτος, houtos): This term here is somewhat dismissive, indicating an unfamiliar or contemptible person.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In the broader context of ancient religious traditions, this verse exemplifies the reverence afforded to established prophets and the skepticism toward new religious figures.
Similar to how ancient Greek oracles or Egyptian priests were revered, Moses was viewed by the Jewish people as the quintessential prophet.
The situation in John 9:29 can be paralleled to instances in other cultures where emerging spiritual leaders were often initially met with suspicion or rejection.
Scientific Perspectives
While the verse itself does not directly engage with scientific concepts, the mention of knowledge ("we know") invites consideration of different forms of epistemology, the study of knowledge.
In contrast to the empiricism that underpins the scientific method, the Pharisees in this verse rely on tradition and scriptural authority to claim their knowledge. This reflects the tension between faith-based and empirical approaches to truth.
Commentaries
Many biblical scholars and commentaries interpret this verse as an illustration of the religious leaders' spiritual stubbornness and their refusal to recognize Jesus's divine mission.
Matthew Henry's Commentary notes that the Pharisees were confident in their traditions and resisted the clear evidence of Jesus's works.
The MacArthur Study Bible emphasizes the theme of spiritual blindness in John's Gospel, while The New Interpreter's Bible points out the irony that the religious experts fail to recognize the one Moses spoke of, despite their claims to follow Moses.