What does Luke 20:21 mean?
Explanation
The verse Luke 20:21 from the King James Version of the Bible occurs within a dialogue between Jesus and a group of spies sent by the chief priests and scribes.
These leaders are attempting to trap Jesus with his own words so they can hand him over to the authority of the governor.
The spies begin by flattering Jesus, acknowledging his teaching as truthful and without favoritism.
However, their compliment is deceptive, as they follow it with a tricky question about paying taxes to Caesar meant to catch Jesus in a political or religious misstep.
The spies acknowledge that Jesus speaks the truth of God's ways directly and does not show partiality to individuals, setting the stage for what they believe will be a no-win situation for Jesus.
Top Rated Luke Books
Historical Context
The verse is situated during the final week of Jesus' life, often referred to as Passion Week.
This was a time of heightened tension in Jerusalem, as it was close to the Jewish feast of Passover when Jewish nationalism and hopes for a Messiah to overthrow Roman rule ran high.
The Jewish authorities were deeply disturbed by Jesus' teachings and growing influence among the people.
They were seeking a legal basis to arrest him without causing public outrage, which led to the deceitful approach seen in this verse.
Theological Insights
From a theological standpoint, this verse has several layers:
- Authenticity of Jesus' Teachings: The spies' description of Jesus teaching the way of God "truly" reaffirms His authority and authenticity as a teacher who accurately represents God's intentions.
- Jesus' Impartiality: By stating that Jesus does not "accept the person of any,” the verse addresses Jesus' impartiality, hinting at a universal truth that transcends societal and cultural distinctions, which is fundamental to Christian theology.
- Human Deceptiveness vs Divine Truth: The spies' attempt to flatter and trap Jesus contrasts human deceitfulness with divine truth, pointing to the theological theme of sin and deception that separates humans from God.
Practical Applications
In daily life, Christians can apply the teachings of this verse by:
- Striving for honesty and integrity when speaking or teaching, especially concerning matters of faith.
- Recognizing the importance of not showing favoritism and treating all individuals with equal respect and fairness.
- Being wary of insincerity and the ulterior motives that can underlie flattery or praise.
Cross-References
- Matthew 22:16: "And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men."
- Mark 12:14: "And when they were come, they say unto him, Master, we know that thou art true, and carest for no man: for thou regardest not the person of men, but teachest the way of God in truth: Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar, or not?"
Language Study
The key phrases here within their Koine Greek context include:
- "Sayest and teachest rightly" (ὀρθῶς λέγεις καὶ διδάσκεις): The adverb ὀρθῶς (orthōs) implies correctness or straightness, reinforcing the truthfulness of Jesus' teachings.
- "Acceptest thou the person" (οὐ λαμβάνεις πρόσωπον): The term πρόσωπον (prosōpon) can mean face, implying not showing partiality based on outward appearance or status, a principle deeply rooted in the ethics Jesus taught.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In comparing this with other ancient religious interpretations, one finds parallels in the principle of impartiality within Buddhism's emphasis on equanimity and Hinduism's concept of universal oneness, which discourages discrimination.
Scientific Perspectives
While this verse does not directly intersect with scientific understandings, modern psychology does explore the phenomena of flattery and deception, as well as the role of bias and favoritism in human behavior, thus providing insight into the motivations behind the question posed to Jesus.
Commentaries
Various biblical scholars and theologians offer diverse perspectives:
- Some commentaries suggest the spies were possibly hoping Jesus would make a politically charged statement against Rome to use as grounds for his arrest.
- Others contemplate the spiritual malice behind the deceit, comparing the insincere flattery to tactics used by the serpent in Genesis.
- A number of scholars focus on the significance of Jesus' response (following in the next verses) as it demonstrates His wisdom in handling attempts to discredit Him.