What does Luke 20:34 mean?
Explanation
Luke 20:34 records Jesus' response to a question posed by the Sadducees, a group that did not believe in the resurrection.
They presented Jesus with a hypothetical scenario where a woman marries seven brothers in succession, each dying without leaving children, and they ask whose wife she will be in the resurrection.
Jesus' answer points out that earthly institutions such as marriage, which are a part of human social structure, do not operate the same way in the afterlife.
Unlike humans ("the children of this world"), who engage in marriage, the resurrected ones will not be given in marriage.
Here, Jesus draws a clear distinction between the mortal existence known to humans and the eternal, resurrected life promised to believers.
Top Rated Luke Books
Historical Context
At the time of Jesus' speaking, marriage was a fundamental component of Jewish social life, serving not only personal but also socio-economic functions, such as the creation of alliances and the production of heirs.
The Sadducees, who were generally of priestly and aristocratic circles, posed the question likely to challenge Jesus and possibly to ridicule the Pharisees' belief in the resurrection.
Their question was based on the Levirate marriage law found in Deuteronomy 25:5-6, which aimed to ensure that a deceased man's name and estate were not lost if he died without a male heir.
Theological Insights
Theologically, this verse can be interpreted from various perspectives. For example, from a traditional Christian viewpoint, it signifies that life after the resurrection is fundamentally different from earthly life.
Some scholars may emphasise that Jesus' teaching indicates the irrelevance of earthly ties and statuses in Heaven. Alternatively, from a more symbolic perspective, marriage may represent attachment and desire which are transcended in the spiritual state of resurrection.
Practical Applications
A practical application could be the understanding that human institutions are temporary and not to be confused with ultimate spiritual truths.
This could inspire individuals to prioritize spiritual growth and the nurturing of one's relationship with God over the pursuit of temporal relationships or gains.
It may also provide comfort for those who have lost spouses, as it suggests a unique form of existence beyond life on Earth.
Cross-References
- Matthew 22:30 - "For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven."
- Mark 12:25 - "For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven."
- Revelation 14:4 - "These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins.
These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth.
These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb."
Language Study
In the original Greek text of the New Testament, the phrase "children of this world" is "υἱοὶ τοῦ αἰῶνος τούτου" (huioi tou aiōnos toutou), where "υἱοὶ" (huioi) means "sons" or "children," and "αἰῶνος" (aiōnos) refers to an "age" or "world." The word "αἰῶνος" carries a connotation of a time-related period or the characteristics of an era.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
Comparisons can be drawn with other ancient cultures that had beliefs regarding the afterlife and marriage.
For instance, in ancient Egypt, marriage was also an essential aspect of life, but there were different beliefs about whether marriage exists in the afterlife.
Similarly, in many Greek myths, mortal life is starkly contrasted with the eternal nature of the gods, often with different rules applying to each.
Scientific Perspectives
From a modern scientific standpoint, marriage is understood as a social and cultural construct; it doesn't have a direct correlation with the natural or physical laws governing life and death.
Therefore, the consideration of marriage in a post-mortem existence is outside the realm of empirical science and lies within the field of metaphysics and spirituality.
commentaries
Commentators and scholars have offered various interpretations of this verse.
For example, some agree that Jesus is refuting the Sadducees' understanding of resurrection, emphasising the discontinuity between this life and the life to come.
Renowned biblical scholars like John Calvin noted the distinction made by Jesus between the earthly and heavenly states.
In contrast, modern commentary often reflects on the nature of the question as a challenge to Jesus' authority and teachings on the resurrection.