What does Luke 20:37 mean?
Explanation
Luke 20:37 speaks to Jesus’ teaching on the resurrection.
In a conversation with the Sadducees, who deny the resurrection of the dead, Jesus refers to the writings of Moses in an event known as "the burning bush" incident (Exodus 3:1-6) to argue that the dead are raised.
Jesus cites the moment when God reveals Himself to Moses as "the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob." His argument is that God is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for all live to him, implying that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were alive to God, therefore, attesting the reality of the resurrection.
Top Rated Luke Books
Historical Context
Luke 20:37 is situated within the Gospel of Luke in the New Testament. This exchange occurs during the Passion Week, the final week of Jesus' life before His crucifixion.
The context involves a series of challenges to Jesus’ authority by different Jewish religious groups.
The Sadducees, a sect that did not believe in resurrection or an afterlife, question Jesus, hoping to trap Him with a question about marriage at the resurrection.
Jesus' response to the Sadducees seeks to correct their misunderstanding of the resurrection and the nature of the eternal life.
Theological Insights
Different theological viewpoints recognize this verse as a significant affirmation of the doctrine of the resurrection.
From a conservative Christian perspective, this passage is seen as Christ's affirmation of life after death and the continuation of existence in the presence of God.
Liberal theologians might focus on the deeper meaning of God being the God of the living, possibly interpreting it more metaphorically, focusing on the legacy or ongoing impact that individuals like Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob have on the living.
In either case, this verse underlines the idea that God's relationship with individuals transcends physical death.
Practical Applications
One practical application from Luke 20:37 is the encouragement it gives to believe in life after death, providing hope and comfort to those who are mourning the passing of loved ones.
It can also serve as a reminder for individuals to live a life reflective of eternal values, knowing that their relationship with God continues beyond their earthly existence.
This belief can influence moral and ethical decisions, community involvement, and personal conduct.
Cross-References
- Exodus 3:6: Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.
And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon God.
- Mark 12:26-27: And as touching the dead, that they rise: have ye not read in the book of Moses, how in the bush God spake unto him, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: ye therefore do greatly err.
- Matthew 22:32: I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.
Language Study
In the original Greek text, the use of "ἐγέρσιν" (egersin) corresponds to "raising" or "resurrection," and is a key word in this passage.
It carries the connotation of being raised up or standing up again, asserting the active power of God in resurrecting the dead.
The naming of the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, serves to emphasize the personal and relational nature of God, not simply a deity of a distant past but of an everlasting present.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In ancient cultures, there were various beliefs about the afterlife.
For example, the Egyptians believed in a complex afterlife where the soul would undergo judgment.
There was also a widespread belief in the Greek world of an Underworld.
The notion of resurrection, however, particularly as a bodily resurrection, is rather unique to Judaism and Christianity, differing significantly from these other cultural beliefs which often viewed the afterlife as a shadowy or lesser existence.
Scientific Perspectives
From a scientific perspective, the concept of resurrection deals with questions beyond the scope of empirical science.
Science operates within the framework of natural explanations and observable phenomena, while resurrection is a supernatural event claimed by religious faith.
As such, it remains outside the realm of what science can examine or confirm, presenting a belief that is accepted by faith amongst believers rather than through the scientific method.
Commentaries
Various biblical scholars and theologians have offered interpretations on Luke 20:37:
- John Calvin notes that Jesus skillfully uses the tense of the verb to argue that these patriarchs are living to God, which implies resurrection.
- William Barclay emphasizes the revolutionary nature of Jesus’ teaching, as it confronted the Sadducees’ disbelief in the resurrection.
- The Pulpit Commentary points out the significant doctrinal implications of Jesus’ reminder about God being exclusively associated with life, and consequently, the resurrection.
- Many modern commentators see this passage as a foundational text for the Christian belief in the resurrection of the dead and the continuation of life beyond death.