What does Luke 19:14 mean?
Explanation
Luke 19:14 contains a fragment of one of Jesus' parables, specifically the Parable of the Ten Minas, where a nobleman goes to a distant country to receive for himself a kingdom and then return.
The verse speaks of the nobleman's subjects who despise him and send a delegation after him to express their rejection of his rule.
On a literal level, it describes a political rebellion against a would-be king by his own citizens.
On a deeper level, this parable and the verse in question are often interpreted as an allegory for Jesus himself, who, having come to His people, is rejected by them.
The citizens' message symbolizes the rejection of Jesus' lordship and authority by the people he came to save.
Top Rated Luke Books
Historical Context
The Parable of the Ten Minas is found in the Gospel of Luke, which was written around AD 80-90.
The book was addressed to an individual named Theophilus and was intended to give an orderly account of the life of Jesus and the early Christian church.
Given the political climate at the time, where Judea was a Roman province, the theme of a nobleman going to receive a kingdom would resonate with the contemporary audience, as it reflected how power was often negotiated and authority established in the Roman Empire.
Theological Insights
Among theologians, this parable, including verse 14, is seen in various lights. A common view is that the nobleman represents Jesus Christ and the citizens who reject him represent those in Israel who rejected Jesus as the Messiah.
Some theologians extend this to symbolize humanity's broader rejection of God's sovereignty.
Another theological perspective is that the parable teaches about accountability and the use of gifts or resources (represented by the "minas") that God has given to people, with verse 14 highlighting the consequences of rejecting God's authority.
Practical Applications
The practical applications of this verse are concerned with acknowledging and submitting to authority.
In a modern context, this can apply to the social, political, and spiritual areas of life.
On a personal level, it encourages individuals to examine how they respond to the leadership, teachings, and guidance of Christ in their lives.
It also speaks to the responsibility of using one's talents and resources in a way that honors God, understanding that rejection of divine authority has consequences.
Cross-References
- Luke 19:27: "But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me."
- Matthew 21:38: "But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance."
- John 1:11: "He came unto his own, and his own received him not."
- Luke 20:9-16: The Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen, another story where the rightful heir is rejected and killed.
Language Study
Key words in the original Greek language of this verse include:
- "hated" (Greek: emēsan), meaning to detest or to feel hostility toward someone.
- "message" (Greek: presbeian), which refers to an ambassadorship or a consular delegation, emphasizing the formality of the citizens' rebellion.
- "reign over us" (Greek: basileusai eph' hēmas), to rule or to have kingly power, which underlines the political nature of the rejection.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
The allegorical interpretation of this parable finds parallels in other ancient myths and religious texts where leaders or deities are rejected by their people.
For example, in Roman mythology, the gods often interacted with humans, and not all were well-received by mortals.
In the broader context of world religions, there are themes of prophets or central figures being rejected by their own communities or nations, which can be seen in Islam with Muhammad's initial rejection at Mecca and in Hinduism with the various trials faced by incarnations of deities.
Scientific Perspectives
Discussing Luke 19:14 from a scientific perspective does not seem immediately relevant as the verse deals more with human behavior, spirituality, and religious allegory than natural phenomena.
However, one might contemplate on the sociological and psychological aspects of group behavior, authority, and rebellion reflected in the verse, considering why individuals or societies may choose to reject established or prospective authorities.
Commentaries
Biblical scholars and theologians offer diverse insights into this verse.
Some, like John Calvin, emphasize the disdain the people had for their lord and compare it to humanity's natural aversion to God's rule.
Matthew Henry speaks on how the message sent by the citizens represents a bold and presumptuous affront to the nobleman (and allegorically to God), underlining the folly in such an act.
More contemporary scholars might focus on the social and political implications of the parable, how each character might represent different groups in Jesus' time, and the resistance to change or to the new covenant that Jesus brought forth.