What does Mark 7:20 mean?
Explanation
Mark 7:20 pertains to a teaching from Jesus about purity and impurity, a discourse that challenged the prevailing Jewish notions of what makes a person clean or unclean in a spiritual sense.
The verse is a statement made by Jesus to highlight that it is not the consumption of certain foods or the adherence to dietary laws that defile a person, but rather the things that people say and do, which come from within their hearts, are what truly defile them.
In essence, Jesus is teaching that moral impurity, such as evil thoughts, actions, and words, is more critical in the eyes of God than ceremonial impurity as understood by traditional Jewish law.
Top Rated Mark Books
Historical Context
During the time Mark's Gospel was written, Jewish society placed a high emphasis on ritual purity, especially concerning dietary laws and practices.
The Pharisees and scribes often clashed with Jesus over these issues, accusing His disciples of defiling themselves by not strictly observing traditional rituals, such as the washing of hands before eating.
This verse falls within a conversation that Jesus had with the Pharisees and His own disciples, wherein He explains that external adherence to rituals is not as important to God as the purity of a person's heart and actions.
Theological Insights
Theologically, this verse challenges legalistic approaches to religion. It points to a deeper, more personal understanding of purity that goes beyond the ritualistic to the ethical and moral dimensions of life.
From a Christian theological perspective, this verse reinforces the concept that salvation and holiness are a matter of grace and internal transformation rather than mere external observance.
Some scholars also see this as part of Jesus' broader mission to redefine the basis of Jewish religious life by emphasizing internal virtue over external ritual compliance.
Practical Applications
In practical terms, Mark 7:20 can be interpreted as a call for introspection and moral vigilance.
It encourages individuals to focus on cultivating inner purity through their thoughts, intentions, and actions.
In daily life, this could mean prioritizing ethical behavior and sincerity over merely appearing righteous or fulfilling religious obligations.
It also serves as a reminder of the importance of what we communicate and the need to guard our words and actions as they reflect our character.
Cross-References
- Matthew 15:11: "Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man."
- Matthew 15:18-20: "But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man."
- James 3:6: "And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell."
Language Study
In the original Greek text, the word translated as "defileth" is "koinoo," which means to make common or unclean, to desecrate or profane.
The focus is on the moral or spiritual state being compromised rather than physical cleanliness.
When Jesus says "that which cometh out of the man," this refers to spoken words and actions that originate from a person's inner thoughts and desires.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In the broader ancient Near Eastern context, many cultures had dietary laws and purity rituals. For example, the ancient Egyptians practiced elaborate mummification techniques and rituals to purify the dead.
However, Jesus' teachings in Mark 7:20 deviate from these purely external practices by emphasizing the ethical and moral dimensions of purity. This stress on internal over external purity was quite distinctive among the religious teachings of the time.
Scientific Perspectives
Modern psychology and behavioral science have explored the concept that our actions and words can reflect our inner state and also influence it. The idea that what we express can either contribute to psychological health or reflect inner turmoil is broadly supported in psychological literature.
While the verse itself does not engage directly with scientific discourse, the emphasis on internal states influencing external behaviors aligns with contemporary understandings of human psychology.
commentaries
Various Biblical scholars and theologians have commented on this verse.
For example, William Barclay notes that Jesus challenged the notion that religion is about rules and regulations, asserting that true religion is about the state of one's heart.
John Calvin emphasizes the corrupt nature of the human heart and the need for divine grace to purify it.
Matthew Henry comments on the importance of guarding one's speech as it can reveal the impurity of the heart, while also highlighting the need for Christ's atoning sacrifice to cleanse humanity's inherent sinfulness.
These commentaries provide a spectrum of interpretations that underscore the spiritual and ethical emphases of this passage in Mark's Gospel.