What does Mark 9:11 mean?
Explanation
This verse comes from the Gospel of Mark, where Jesus's disciples ask why the scribes (Jewish law teachers of the time) say that Elijah must come first, before the advent of the Messianic age.
This question arises after Jesus, with Peter, James, and John, experiences the Transfiguration on the mountain where they see Jesus talking with Elijah and Moses.
The disciples are wrestling with the relationship between Jesus’s work and the expected coming of Elijah as a forerunner to the Messiah, according to prophetic tradition.
Top Rated Mark Books
Historical Context
The historical context of this verse is in first-century Judea under Roman occupation.
Jewish eschatological expectation was high, with many hoping for a Messiah who would deliver Israel from Roman rule.
The prophecy concerning Elijah's return comes from the book of Malachi (4:5-6), which predicted that Elijah would come before the "great and dreadful day of the Lord." Because of this prophecy, the Jewish people were expecting the literal or figurative return of Elijah as a precursor to the arrival of the Messiah.
Theological Insights
Theologically, this verse touches on Jewish messianic expectations and how Jesus fulfills these prophecies.
There are several viewpoints on Jesus’s response to the disciples’ question:
- Traditional Christian theology asserts that John the Baptist fulfilled the role of Elijah as the precursor to the Messiah, as suggested by Jesus in the following verses of Mark.
- Some scholars might see this as a non-literal fulfillment, where Elijah's "coming" is thematic or typological, rather than a physical reappearance.
- Others may view this reference as indicative of an apocalyptic expectation which early followers of Jesus, and Jesus himself, possibly shared when considering the end times.
Practical Applications
From this verse, followers can reflect on the importance of understanding scriptural prophecies and their fulfillment.
It prompts believers to discern historical and spiritual truths.
Practically, it asks the modern disciple to look for the deeper meanings in events and people that might signify a spiritual truth or fulfillment of God's promises, and to be cautious about overly literal interpretations of prophecy.
Cross-References
- Malachi 4:5-6 (KJV): "Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD..."
- Matthew 11:14 (KJV): "And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come."
- Matthew 17:10-13 (KJV): The disciples' question about Elijah and Jesus' explanation that John the Baptist was Elijah who was to come.
- Luke 1:17 (KJV): "And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias..."
Language Study
In the original Greek language, "Elias" refers to Elijah, the Old Testament prophet.
The Greek term "dei" (δεῖ), translated as "must," conveys a sense of divine necessity or ordained events. The scribes mention "Elias" within their interpretation of the prophetic books, which would have carried significant weight in their teachings and societal understanding.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In the Jewish tradition, Elijah is a figure of immense importance, often believed to be present at significant events and during Passover, an empty seat is left for Elijah.
Comparatively, other cultures have figures who were prophesied to return, bringing enlightenment or judgment, such as the Persian figure Saoshyant or the Mesoamerican deity Quetzalcoatl.
Scientific Perspectives
From a scientific standpoint, this verse does not intersect directly with empirical data or processes.
However, in a discussion about prophecy, science might explore the psychological elements of expectation, fulfillment, and pattern-seeking behavior in human cognition, as well as the cultural impact of anticipation rooted in religious beliefs.
Commentaries
Various biblical commentators offer insights into Mark 9:11:
- John Calvin suggests that the scribes err in teaching that Elijah must physically appear, while the true fulfillment is in the appearance of John the Baptist.
- The Pulpit Commentary notes that the scribe's expectation was not misguided but incomplete, not accounting for the spiritual embodiment of Elijah's role in John the Baptist.
- Matthew Henry's commentary states that the disciples were confused because they saw Elijah at the Transfiguration but did not observe any changes to their current state, thus questioning the need for Elijah's coming before the Messiah.
Henry underscores that John the Baptist came in the spirit of Elijah to prepare the way for Jesus.