What does Matthew 21:37 mean?
Explanation
Matthew 21:37 speaks about the climax of the parable of the vineyard, attributed to Jesus Christ.
In this parable, a landowner plants a vineyard and leases it to vine-growers before going on a journey.
When the harvest time approaches, the landowner sends his servants to the vine-growers to receive his produce.
However, the servants are beaten, killed, and stoned.
Finally, the landowner decides to send his son, thinking they will respect him.
This verse encapsulates the hope and expectation the landowner has for the vine-growers to exhibit reverence towards his son.
On a deeper level, the son in the parable is often interpreted to represent Jesus himself, with the landowner being God, and the vineyard being the Kingdom of Israel.
The servants who were sent first are seen as prophets who came before Jesus, and their mistreatment signifies the rejection of the prophets by the people of Israel.
The broader message of the verse anticipates the belief that God, after having sent prophets, has sent his Son, whom he expects to be honored and obeyed.
Top Rated Matthew Books
Historical Context
This verse is part of the Gospel of Matthew, traditionally believed to be penned by Matthew, the tax collector and one of Jesus' disciples.
The text is situated in a period where Jesus teaches in parables to convey the religious and ethical teachings central to his message.
The historical context of Matthew 21:37 is set in the first century CE, where Judaism was prevalent in Israel and the Second Temple was still standing.
Here, the expectation of a Messianic figure was part of the cultural and religious landscape.
The parables of Jesus were often directed at the religious leaders of the time, who were seen as the tenants who were not properly tending to the 'vineyard' which God had entrusted to them.
Theological Insights
From a Christian theological perspective, this verse underlines the idea of Jesus as the fulfillment of prophecies and the divine sonship of Christ.
It touches on themes of judgement, accountability, and the rejection of Jesus by the leaders of Israel, which plays a substantial role in Christian soteriology, or the study of salvation.
Other theological viewpoints may interpret this parable differently.
Some Jewish scholars might see this as a critique of the leadership at the time, but would not ascribe the aspects of sonship and messianism to Jesus.
Furthermore, non-Christian interpretations may read the parable purely in its ethical dimensions, focusing on the treatment of those sent by the owner (God) and how humanity should respond to divine messages.
Practical Applications
In contemporary life, this verse can serve as a reminder of the importance of respecting and listening to those who are sent with messages that challenge or benefit society.
It can also be a call to self-examination for people in positions of religious authority to ensure that they are not rejecting valuable teachings due to pride or vested interests.
More broadly, it speaks to the concept of stewardship and how individuals are responsible for how they manage what has been entrusted to them.
Cross-References
- Matthew 21:33-41 (Parable of the Vineyard)
- Mark 12:1-9 (Mark’s version of the Parable of the Vineyard)
- Luke 20:9-16 (Luke’s version of the Parable of the Vineyard)
- Isaiah 5:1-7 (The Song of the Vineyard, a related Old Testament parable)
Language Study
In the original Greek text of Matthew 21:37, key words include:
- "υἱόν" (huion): son.
This term is theologically significant as it implies a unique and special relationship between the sender (God) and Jesus.
- "ἐντραπήσονται" (entrapesontai): will respect/revere.
Derived from the Greek word "entrepo," to turn about, respect, or reverence.
It indicates an expectation of honor and deference, which is significant in this context.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
The use of vineyard imagery can be traced to other cultural and religious traditions.
For instance, in ancient literature, the vineyard is often a symbol for a precious possession that needs to be cared for, such as in the Epic of Gilgamesh.
Similarly, in Roman culture, the parable might resonate with moral tales about the obligations of stewards and the respect due to a father's emissaries or children.
Scientific Perspectives
While not directly related to scientific inquiry, the verse does touch on human psychology and sociology regarding the treatment of authority figures and messages that challenge the status quo.
Scientific studies in areas like behavioral science can offer insights into why individuals or groups might reject messengers who bring vital yet disruptive teachings or changes.
Commentaries
Biblical scholars offer various interpretations of Matthew 21:37.
Some focus on the eschatological implications of the verse, viewing it as a foretelling of the coming judgement of Israel for its leaders' rejection of Jesus.
Others interpret the parable as an allegory for God's dealing with humanity throughout history.
Contemporary theologians might emphasize the social justice elements, urging a critical look at how present-day religious and societal leaders respond to calls for reform and introspection.
Most agree that the parable clearly positions the son as a distinctive figure whose arrival is poignant and significant, anticipating a turning point in the narrative of God's interaction with his people.