What does Matthew 21:46 mean?
Explanation
Matthew 21:46 portrays a tense moment where the chief priests and Pharisees are plotting against Jesus. They desire to arrest him because they are threatened by his teachings and the influence he has over the people.
However, they are hesitant to take action because Jesus is popular with the masses, who regard him as a prophet.
On a literal level, this verse shows the conflict between Jesus and the religious leaders of his time.
On a deeper level, the verse illustrates the struggle between established power structures and prophetic truth.
Despite the desire of the leaders to maintain control, they are aware of the people's reverence for Jesus and are fearful of potential backlash.
Top Rated Matthew Books
Historical Context
This verse is set in the context of the week before Jesus's crucifixion in Jerusalem. During this period, Jesus was actively teaching in the temple and attracting large crowds.
The religious leaders, including the chief priests and the Pharisees, felt threatened by his teachings and the challenge they posed to their authority.
The cultural and historical influence of prophets in Israel was significant, as they were traditionally seen as messengers of God.
In the context of this scripture, the multitude's perception of Jesus as a prophet made it politically dangerous for the authorities to arrest him in a public and forceful manner.
Theological Insights
From a theological perspective, this verse reflects on the theme of prophecy and its reception.
It underscores the tension between institutional religion, represented by the chief priests and Pharisees, and the role of a prophet, embodied by Jesus.
Different theological viewpoints might focus on the integrity and courage of Jesus in the face of opposition from those in power or alternatively consider the shortsightedness and fear that can accompany institutional authority when it encounters prophetic truth.
Practical Applications
In contemporary terms, this verse encourages individuals to discern and stand by the truth, even in the face of opposition from those in authority.
It may also serve as a cautionary tale about the risks of valuing social or political stability over justice and righteousness.
Believers can apply this teaching by advocating for what is right and supporting those who speak out against injustice, even when it is not the popular thing to do.
Cross-References
- Matthew 26:3-5: "Then assembled together the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders of the people, unto the palace of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas, And consulted that they might take Jesus by subtilty, and kill him.
But they said, Not on the feast day, lest there be an uproar among the people."
- John 7:30: "Then they sought to take him: but no man laid hands on him, because his hour was not yet come."
- Matthew 14:5: "And when he would have put him to death, he feared the multitude, because they counted him as a prophet."
Language Study
The Greek word for "feared" used in this verse is "ephobounto" (ἐφοβοῦντο), an imperfect verb which indicates an ongoing state of fear.
The term for "multitude" is "ochlos" (ὄχλος), referring to a crowd or throng of people.
The phrase "took him for a prophet" is "eichon auton hos propheten" (εἶχον αὐτὸν ὡς προφήτην), where "eichon" is an imperfect verb depicting the people's continued regard for Jesus as a prophet.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
Cultural and religious comparisons can be drawn between the Jewish expectation of prophets and similar roles in other ancient religions.
Many cultures in the ancient Near East had figures who were considered intermediaries between the divine and the human. The way Jesus is seen by the multitude parallels how prophets in other cultures may have been revered and protected by those who believed in their divine message or insight.
Scientific Perspectives
The scientific approach to this verse would typically revolve around the study of crowd psychology and sociology rather than its content, as these fields explore the dynamics of how leaders may respond to the collective beliefs and behaviors of groups.
Understanding the multitude's reaction and the leaders' fear from this perspective could shed light on similar scenarios in the modern context.
Commentaries
Biblical scholars and theologians have various interpretations of this verse, with many acknowledging the chief priests' and Pharisees' fear of Jesus's influence over the people.
Some commentaries reflect on the irony of the situation: the religious leaders are theologically educated yet fail to recognize the prophetic work of Jesus, while the simple people recognize his divine role.
Others may focus on the political implications, such as the potential for unrest and how it constrained the actions of Jesus's opponents.