What does Matthew 26:8 mean?
Explanation
Matthew 26:8 describes the reaction of Jesus' disciples to a woman's act of anointing Jesus with an expensive ointment.
The verse reads, "But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste?" The disciples were upset because they viewed the act as extravagant and wasteful, considering the high value of the ointment which could have been sold and the money given to the poor.
This verse highlights a tension between practical concerns for the poor and the act of worshipful devotion shown to Jesus.
Top Rated Matthew Books
Historical Context
Matthew 26:8 occurs during the last days of Jesus' life, specifically at Bethany where Jesus is in the home of Simon the leper. The woman in question, often identified as Mary, the sister of Martha and Lazarus, pours an expensive ointment on Jesus' head as a form of worship.
The cultural norms of the time held that resources should be used judiciously, especially when it came to helping the poor. Anointing with oil was also a significant action in Jewish culture, often used for consecrating priests, kings, or for burial purposes.
Theological Insights
From a theological standpoint, this verse can be interpreted in various ways:
- Stewardship vs. Worship: The disciples' indignation suggests a focus on practical stewardship and social justice, whereas the anointing by the woman can be seen as an act of devotion and recognition of Jesus' identity and mission.
- Preparation for Burial: Some theologians consider the anointing as foreshadowing Jesus' death and burial, giving the act a prophetic dimension.
- Judas Iscariot's Reaction: John's gospel specifically notes that Judas Iscariot, who later betrays Jesus, led the criticism.
This might suggest a contrast between false discipleship and genuine worship.
Practical Applications
In modern times, believers can learn from this verse to balance their responsibilities towards social justice with the need for personal devotion. It encourages individuals to consider the value of sacrificial giving as an expression of love and adoration towards God.
Furthermore, it prompts reflection on one's motives when it comes to charitable acts, are they done out of self-interest or genuine concern for the marginalized?
Cross-References
- Mark 14:4-5: "And there were some that had indignation within themselves, and said, Why was this waste of the ointment made?"
- John 12:4-6: "Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, which should betray him, Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?"
- John 12:7-8: "Then said Jesus, Let her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this."
Language Study
In the original Greek text:
- "Disciples" is "μαθηταί" (mathētai), meaning students or followers.
- "Indignation" is "ἀγανακτέω" (aganakteō), expressing strong disapproval or irritation.
- "Waste" is "ἀπώλεια" (apōleia), which can mean destruction or loss, implying that the disciples saw the act as a squandering of resources.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In other ancient religious traditions, anointing was also a significant act.
For example, in Egypt, the pharaohs were anointed as part of their coronation, signifying divine approval.
In Greco-Roman culture, anointing athletes and heroes was common.
The act of anointing by Mary takes on a unique significance within the Christian narrative as a recognition of Jesus' kingship and his impending death.
Scientific Perspectives
Scientifically, one might explore the properties of the ointment used, often believed to be spikenard, which had value due to its rarity and importation from distant lands.
While modern science focuses on practical utility and economic value, this passage challenges readers to consider the intangible value of symbolic acts and their significance in human culture and psychology.
Commentaries
Various biblical scholars and theologians offer differing insights into this verse:
- Albert Barnes notes the value of the ointment and the practical mindset of the disciples, who might not have understood the full significance of Jesus' mission.
- Matthew Henry emphasizes the beauty of the act of love and sacrifice, pointing out that sincere devotion to Christ is never wasted.
- William Barclay discusses the cultural implications of the act and suggests that the best things in life should be given to Christ.
These diverse interpretations provide a broad spectrum of understanding, reflecting the complexity and depth of this biblical event.