What does Matthew 26:9 mean?
Explanation
The verse "For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor." (Matthew 26:9, KJV) arises from an incident where a woman, identified in John’s gospel as Mary of Bethany, anoints Jesus with an expensive perfume.
Some of the disciples, notably Judas Iscariot, according to John 12:4-5, are indignant at what they perceive as a wasteful act.
They argue that the ointment, which was very costly, could have been sold and the money given to the poor.
This statement reflects a tension between the act of devotion shown by the woman and a pragmatic wish to help the less fortunate.
While on the surface it seems to point to a concern for economic stewardship and social responsibility, the account reveals deeper layers of meaning within the narrative, suggesting contrasting attitudes towards Jesus and the significance of His impending death.
Top Rated Matthew Books
Historical Context
The scene occurs during the week leading up to the Passover festival, a highly significant time for the Jewish people, commemorating their liberation from Egyptian slavery.
The location is Bethany, a village near Jerusalem, at the home of Simon the leper.
The anointing with costly perfume was a sign of great honor and devotion.
As the Gospels reveal, Jesus' followers did not always understand His mission or the symbolisms He employed; this is an instance where the immediate practical response to sell the ointment contrasts with the symbolic and prophetic significance Jesus attributes to the woman’s action.
Theological Insights
From a theological perspective, the woman's act is often interpreted as prefiguring Jesus' burial, and Jesus acknowledges this by stating that she has anointed His body for burial in the subsequent verses (Matthew 26:12).
The disciples' objections represent a misunderstanding of Jesus' mission and impending sacrifice.
Judas' complaint also foreshadows his betrayal of Jesus, and John explicitly connects the two events (John 12:6).
Orthodox theology emphasizes the worthiness of offering one's best to God, akin to Old Testament sacrifices.
Some commentators suggest that this act of devotion shows the woman's insight into the value of Christ's person and work.
From a Liberation theology point of view, the tension is seen between the spiritual act of devotion and the physical needs of the poor, asserting that following Jesus includes social justice responsibilities.
In Evangelical theology, the passage is cited as a reminder that Christ should take precedence over all things, including charitable deeds.
Practical Applications
In daily life, the verse encourages believers to prioritize their relationship with Christ and to discern when to offer acts of devotion that might not align with pragmatic or worldly values.
It also serves as a reminder for followers to be aware of false piety, like that displayed by Judas, and instead practice genuine faithfulness and generosity.
Cross-References
- John 12:3-8: Offers a parallel account and identifies the woman as Mary, who anoints Jesus' feet.
- Mark 14:4-5: Mark’s account of the same incident, echoing the sentiment of the economic value of the perfume.
- Matthew 26:12: Jesus explains the significance of the anointing as preparation for his burial.
- John 13:29: Some at the Last Supper thought Jesus was telling Judas to give something to the poor, illustrating the ongoing theme of providing for the poor in Jesus' teachings.
- 1 Timothy 6:17-19: Encourages wealthy followers to be generous and willing to share.
Language Study
In the original Greek text, the phrase “might have been sold” is from the verb πραθῆναι (prathēnai), a form of πιπράσκω (piprasko), which means to sell. This verb is in the aorist infinitive passive, indicating an action that could have been completed.
“For much” translates to πολλοῦ (pollou), an adverb meaning "for a great price" or "at a high value".
The word “poor” is πτωχοὺς (ptōchous), describing individuals who are economically destitute.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In the context of other ancient traditions, offerings of great value were common as acts of devotion to deities or revered figures.
The story echoes themes found in various cultures where the excessive display of wealth or resources could prompt discussions about appropriate use, especially in the context of need within the society.
Scientific Perspectives
While this verse does not directly engage with scientific perspectives, the economic considerations of resource allocation, what might today be studied in the disciplines of economics or sociology, are relevant.
Modern science might pose questions about the best utilitarian use of resources for maximum societal benefit.
However, the act of anointing in the biblical context is symbolic rather than utilitarian.
Commentaries
Various biblical scholars provide a range of interpretations.
For instance, some focus on the literal misunderstanding of Jesus' mission by the disciples and specifically Judas' forthcoming betrayal.
Others deeper analyze the symbolic act of anointing and its significance in the light of Old Testament practices.
Yet, some concentrate on the social message, discussing the balance between showing devotion to God and caring for the poor, emphasizing that they are not mutually exclusive, and proper discernment is necessary to harmonize these aspects of faith.