What does Matthew 27:20 mean?
Explanation
Matthew 27:20 recounts a pivotal moment during the trial of Jesus of Nazareth before Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea.
This verse indicates that the chief priests and elders, who were the religious leaders of the time, actively persuaded the crowd to ask for the release of Barabbas, a notorious criminal, instead of Jesus.
This verse highlights the influence these leaders had over the public opinion and their determination to see Jesus condemned to death.
The deeper meaning may also suggest a portrayal of collective injustice and the manipulation of the crowd to achieve a wrongful outcome, which, in Christian belief, ultimately leads to the fulfillment of the divine plan of salvation.
Top Rated Matthew Books
Historical Context
The event takes place during the Jewish festival of Passover, a time when Jerusalem would have been crowded with pilgrims.
During this festival, it was customary for the Roman governor to release a prisoner chosen by the populace.
Barabbas, mentioned in this verse, is known to have been a notable prisoner involved in insurrection and possibly murder.
The chief priests and elders saw this as an opportunity to influence the crowd to secure the execution of Jesus, whom they saw as a threat to their power and to the status quo of Jewish religious practices under Roman occupation.
Theological Insights
From a theological perspective, this verse can be seen as fulfilling Old Testament prophecies about the suffering and sacrificial death of the Messiah (such as Isaiah 53).
In Christian theology, the choice of Barabbas over Jesus symbolizes the choice of sin and rebellion over righteousness and innocence.
The mob choosing Barabbas reflects humanity's propensity to reject God's offer of salvation through Jesus Christ.
Moreover, the passage indicates the human inability to recognize the divine and highlights the necessity of divine grace for salvation.
Practical Applications
The practical applications of this verse may prompt believers to consider the consequences of following the crowd or succumbing to societal pressure, especially when it leads to injustice or the harm of innocent persons.
It also serves as a cautionary reflection about the power of leaders and authority figures to manipulate public opinion and the importance of individual discernment and moral courage.
Cross-References
- John 18:40 - "Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas.
Now Barabbas was a robber."
- Mark 15:11 - "But the chief priests moved the people, that he should rather release Barabbas unto them."
- Acts 3:14 - "But ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you;"
- Isaiah 53:3 - "He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not."
Language Study
In the original Greek language of the New Testament, key words to consider include:
- "πρεσβύτεροι" (presbyteroi) - typically translated as "elders" or "senior leaders," referring to the Jewish leaders of the Sanhedrin.
- "έπεισαν" (epeisan) - translated as "persuaded," implying the use of rhetoric or influence to convince the crowd.
- "όχλον" (ochlon) - meaning a crowd or multitude, emphasizing the collective aspect of the decision.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In the cultural context of the time, it was not uncommon for religious and political leaders to sway public opinion for their own ends.
In comparison to other ancient religions and myths, the concept of a sacrificial figure or a scapegoat is recurrent.
For instance, in ancient Greek myths, figures such as Prometheus suffered for the benefit of mankind.
The story of Barabbas over Jesus can be seen as a motif where a seemingly less worthy individual is chosen or spared over a more righteous one.
Scientific Perspectives
Scientific perspectives on this verse might explore the psychological phenomenon known as "groupthink," where a group's desire for conformity results in an irrational decision-making outcome.
Additionally, the study of crowd psychology could provide insights into how the chief priests and elders were able to manipulate the crowd's choice.
Commentaries
Biblical scholars and commentators have varied interpretations of this verse.
Some emphasize the historical and political maneuvering of the religious leaders in their effort to maintain their power.
Others focus on the symbolic meaning of the choice between Jesus and Barabbas, reflecting deep spiritual truths about sin and redemption.
Prominent commentaries like those of Matthew Henry or the MacArthur Study Bible delve into the aspects of prophetic fulfillment and God's sovereignty, even in the face of human injustice.