What does Matthew 27:43 mean?
Explanation
The verse Matthew 27:43 comes from the account of Jesus' crucifixion.
It reflects the mockeries that Jesus faced while he was on the cross.
The onlookers challenge Jesus' claim of divinity and his trust in God, suggesting that if he is truly the Son of God, he should be able to save himself from his current predicament.
They taunt him by saying that if God values him, then God should rescue him.
The literal meaning is clear; it reflects a direct challenge to Jesus' relationship with God and his previous claims.
Deeper meanings might explore themes of doubt, faith, and the fulfillment of prophecy, along with the irony that while Jesus had saved others, he chose not to save himself to fulfill his messianic mission.
Top Rated Matthew Books
Historical Context
Matthew 27:43 is part of the New Testament narrative of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
It's important to understand that crucifixion was a common Roman method of execution, known for its extreme cruelty and shamefulness.
Jesus being crucified would have been perceived as weakness and defeat by many at the time.
The taunts in this verse reflect the cultural expectations of the Messiah as a militaristic and political deliverer, rather than a suffering servant, which would have been at odds with Jesus' actual mission.
Theological Insights
From a Christian theological perspective, this verse can be seen through the lens of Jesus' fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy, his role as a suffering servant, and the concept of divine paradox, where apparent defeat is actually victory.
It engages with the doctrine of kenosis, the self-emptying of Jesus' own will and becoming entirely receptive to God’s divine will.
Some theologians might see it as highlighting the mystery of the incarnation: Jesus, fully human, suffers and is subject to ridicule, yet he remains fully divine.
Practical Applications
This verse can prompt reflection on faith under adversity. For modern believers, it might suggest that being a follower of Christ does not guarantee escape from suffering or mockery.
Furthermore, it could encourage believers to put trust in God's plans, even when those plans don't align with immediate rescue or relief from difficult situations.
The verse can also challenge individuals to consider how they respond to mockery or doubt related to their faith.
Cross-References
- Psalm 22:8 "He trusted on the Lord that he would deliver him: let him deliver him, seeing he delighted in him."
- Matthew 4:3 "And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread."
- Matthew 26:63 "But Jesus held his peace.
And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God."
- Luke 23:35 "And the people stood beholding.
And the rulers also with them derided him, saying, He saved others; let him save himself, if he be Christ, the chosen of God."
Language Study
The key phrases in the original Koine Greek text of Matthew 27:43 include:
- ἠλπίσεν (ēlpisen): Translated as "he trusted," which implies a reliance or confidence.
- εἰ (ei): Often translated as "if," it denotes a conditional statement here and carries a tone of challenge.
- θέλει (thelei): This means "he wills" or "he wants," reflecting the question of God's desire to save Jesus.
- σῴζειν (sōzein): This verb means "to save" or "to deliver," and its tense here reflects a present action that should be taken, according to the mockers.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
In various ancient myths, the theme of a divine figure facing trials or even death is not uncommon. For example, the stories of dying-and-rising gods in some religious traditions mirror aspects of the crucifixion and resurrection narrative.
However, the unique element in the Christian account is the idea of a divine figure voluntarily undergoing suffering for the sake of humanity's redemption, which sharply contrasts with the more triumphal or cyclical characteristics of other ancient myths.
Scientific Perspectives
The relationship between Matthew 27:43 and scientific perspectives is largely based on historical and psychological analysis rather than empirical science.
Historical studies can provide insights into the methods of Roman crucifixion, while psychology can delve into the human behaviors and cognitive biases reflected in the taunting and mocking of figures believed to hold different or challenging beliefs.
Commentaries
Biblical scholars and commentators have long reflected on Matthew 27:43.
Some emphasize the fulfillment of prophetic Psalms, like Psalm 22, which describes the suffering of an innocent person and includes language echoed by the mockers at the cross.
Others may point out the irony in the mockers' words; though intending to deride Jesus, they were unwittingly declaring a truth about his identity and mission.
Commentators like William Barclay note the challenge this verse presents, emphasizing Jesus' embodiment of divine love by remaining on the cross rather than saving Himself.