What does Matthew 27:21 mean?
Explanation
Matthew 27:21 captures a pivotal moment during the Passion of Christ.
Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea, presents a choice to the crowd gathered before him during the Passover festival.
He offers to release one prisoner as was the custom at this time of year.
The choice is between Jesus of Nazareth, who has been charged with inciting rebellion, and Barabbas, a known criminal.
The verse underscores the stark contrast between Jesus, who was innocent of any crime, and Barabbas, an insurrectionist.
Pilate's question seems to suggest an expectation that the crowd will choose Jesus, the harmless preacher and healer, over a violent criminal.
The crowd's demand for Barabbas is unexpected and indicates a deeper meaning: a rejection of Jesus and what he stands for, and a preference for a more familiar form of rebellion.
Top Rated Matthew Books
Historical Context
During the time of Jesus, Palestine was under Roman occupation. The Passover festival was a time when the population of Jerusalem would swell with Jews from all over the Empire, coming to commemorate their liberation from Egyptian slavery.
It was also a period of heightened tension and Roman authorities were wary of insurrection. The release of a prisoner may have been a practice aimed at appeasing the populous and reducing the risk of revolt.
Barabbas is mentioned in the Gospels as a prisoner who was chosen by the crowd over Jesus to be released.
His full name was Jesus Barabbas, which translates to "Jesus, son of the father".
This name's similarity to Jesus Christ's role as the Son of the Father (God) has led to much theological pondering and significance.
Theological Insights
Various theological interpretations arise from this verse.
The choice between Jesus and Barabbas has been viewed symbolically as a choice between sin and righteousness or between earthly and spiritual salvation.
For Christians, the choice of Barabbas over Jesus represents humanity's choice of sin, leading to the crucifixion, which in turn leads to spiritual redemption for all through Jesus' sacrifice.
Some scholars suggest that Barabbas represents the violent revolutionary tendencies which were common among some Jewish factions at the time, juxtaposed against Jesus' message of a peaceable Kingdom of God.
Choosing Barabbas reflects humanity's propensity to look for a messiah who will lead a worldly revolt rather than a spiritual one.
Practical Applications
The choice presented in Matthew 27:21 can be seen as a daily occurrence in the life of individuals: the choice between the easy, worldly option that provides immediate gratification (Barabbas) and the more challenging, moral, and spiritual path represented by Jesus.
In a modern context, this can be reflected in decisions about personal conduct, business ethics, and even political choices. It serves as a reminder to consider carefully the implications of our choices and what they represent, rather than being swayed by the crowd or by short-term benefits.
Cross-References
- John 18:40: "Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas.
Now Barabbas was a robber."
- Mark 15:7: "And there was one named Barabbas, which lay bound with them that had made insurrection with him, who had committed murder in the insurrection."
- Luke 23:18: "And they cried out all at once, saying, Away with this man, and release unto us Barabbas:"
- Acts 3:14: "But ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you;"
Language Study
The key word in this verse is "Barabbas".
In the Greek text, his name is written as Βαραββᾶς (Barabbas), derived from Aramaic bar-abba, meaning "son of the father".
This ironic parallel to Jesus' own title signifies an alternative savior figure, one who embodies a starkly different kind of deliverance.
Another important word is "release" or ἀπολύσω (apolysō) in Greek, meaning to free or let go. This term represents the governor's power, but also the potential liberation or forgiveness that is a significant theme in Christian theology.
Cultural and Religious Comparisons
The incident of releasing a prisoner during a festival might be likened to similar customs in other cultures, where a show of clemency or mercy coincided with major celebrations.
However, the choice between two figures, one representing peace and the other violence, is somewhat unique to the Christian narrative.
In broader religious traditions, this narrative touches upon the theme of the scapegoat, a person or animal who is ritually burdened with the sins of others and then sent away or killed, as found in Leviticus 16:10.
However, in this context, Jesus becomes the ultimate scapegoat for humanity's sins.
Scientific Perspectives
From a scientific perspective, this verse does not directly intersect with empirical evidence or natural laws, as its content is more historical and theological in nature.
However, modern social psychology may offer insights into the crowd behavior and decision-making process depicted in the verse. Concepts such as "groupthink", peer pressure, and authority influence can help explain why the crowd might have chosen a known criminal over Jesus.
Commentaries
Biblical scholars and theologians have diverged in their interpretation of this passage.
Some see it as a historical account that reflects the political and social dynamics of Jerusalem under Roman rule. Others read into it a deeper theological significance.
Commentators like Matthew Henry have pointed out the irony and tragedy of the crowd choosing Barabbas, a sinner, over the sinless Jesus.
William Barclay highlighted the sad reality of people rejecting Jesus because he did not meet their expectations of a Messiah.
These and many other commentaries enrich the understanding of Matthew 27:21 by exploring its various facets and implications.